|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <tlf89vcm9395bv5tg1oo3npqf4i08pve9n@4ax.com>,
ABX <abx### [at] abx art pl> wrote:
> http://www.google.com/search?q=%22proximity+means+distance%22
> http://www.google.com/search?q=%22proximity+is+distance%22
Not sure what you expect these to turn up. A lack of results is not
surprising, they are very badly formed search queries.
This is better:
http://www.google.com/search?q=proximity+definition
> I'm not english master. Not even advanced amateur. Can you provide me a
> reference to definition that proximity is distance? There is no 'distance' in
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=proximity
"The state, quality, sense, or fact of being near or next; closeness:"
Look up "closeness":
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=closeness
"immediate nearness"
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=nearness
Nothing about being blurred, smoothed, or fuzzed out. It's all about
distance, viewed as how near something is rather than how far it is.
> > If you did something like
> > one of those, it was a proximity function
> > (...)
> > But it has nothing to do with proximity.
>
> Hmmm. Two different opinions about the same usage of f_r().
For two different uses. One being a proximity function, the other being
a weighting for convolution samples, in which case the most likely use
is for proximity to the center of the convolution matrix, which is
independant of the input data.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlink net>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |