POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.advanced-users : Random variation : Re: Random variation Server Time
29 Jul 2024 14:25:04 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Random variation  
From: Christopher James Huff
Date: 26 Sep 2002 16:16:11
Message: <chrishuff-B5D58B.16133826092002@netplex.aussie.org>
In article <3d93677c.99183057@news.povray.org>,
 Erk### [at] povrayorg (Erkki S?ndergaard) wrote:

> Yes. Given that the two dice are identical you can't tell the
> difference between 1:4 and 4:1, thus 4:1 is twice as likely to occur
> as 1:1. If we change the premise so we only have one dice that we roll
> twice 1:4 is as likely to occur as 1:1, now we've given value to the
> order (1:4 <> 4:1). If you really want fun with permutations, try to
> calculate the cumulative odds on a slot machine. I once attempted that
> for a simulated slot machine I programmed, I ended up fiddling the
> values until emparative testing showed the desired return rate (or
> close enough) instead.

Gah, alright, I misstated the problem. You know what I meant... ;-)

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.