In article <3dc99cfe@news.povray.org>,
 Fabien HENON <fab### [at] caramailcom> wrote:

> Thanks for your quick answer. It works but it does not seem to be as 
> fast as MegaPov for the same accuracy.

Correct...it is faster and has smoother results, as well as being more 
flexible. It is true that it is slower for the same number of samples, 
but you need fewer samples, the situation is the same as for method 3 
media vs. method 1.


> Another great feature that I miss ( tell me if I am wrong) is the 
> possibility to 'do' an isosurface with a image_map as in :

Checking the documentation might help. That feature was included, you 
are just using it wrong:

   function { fnc_basketballbump(x,y,z).hf} //+

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message