|
|
In article <3a2e1e7f@news.povray.org>, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg>
wrote:
> Why everyone suggests all the hard ways of doing the most simple thing?
> Isosurfaces? Patched versions for non-linear transformations? Come on!
> You really don't need any patched version for this.
But...but that doesn't look as realistic! :-)
Really, I prefer the shapes I can get with isosurfaces(though you can
probably do similar ones with lathe or sor), and the fact that the waves
are real waves, not just normal perturbation.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|