POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.advanced-users : union of unions : Re: union of unions Server Time
29 Jul 2024 14:21:31 EDT (-0400)
  Re: union of unions  
From: Fidel viegas
Date: 11 Sep 2002 14:30:05
Message: <B9A54964.4A1E%fidel.viegas@artrecognition.co.uk>
I can't believe that you guys are still debating on this subject.
Not everybody has the same taste for anything. So why bother with the way
someone else writes his code, or what he uses?
I personally don't modify nobody's code just because it isn't in the same
style as mine. I have to respect his style as well. As long as I understand
it, I don't really care. You should just be aware of different styles.


All the best

Fidel.

in article 3D7F2114.CE5A85EB@pandora.be, Herman Serras at
Her### [at] pandorabe wrote on 11/9/02 11:55 am:

> 
> 
> Warp wrote:
>> 
>> Rune <run### [at] mobilixnetdk> wrote:
>>> There are no "candidates". It's always the first thing you find (on that
>>> indention level), which is what you're looking for. It's not like these
>>> are several things you have to look at, and then figure out which one is
>>> the correct one.
>> ...
>>> By your definitions.
>> ...
>>> I really don't know what you mean.
>> 
>> It seems impossible to talk with you, so I'll just stop. You don't even
>> try nor want to understand what I'm talking about.
> 
> If you look at the original posting in this thread, you'll see that the
> subject has changed quite a lot!
>> 
>> --
>> #macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
>> [1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
>> -1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.