Christoph Hormann wrote:

>Using object pattern in an isosurface function is not such a good idea,
>because it has a abrupt change at the object's surface the isosurface
>code does not like at all.  You could use 'proximity', but it would be
>*really* slow. 

If you add or multiply (or whatever the best method is) the 'object 
pattern' function and the 'normal' function, would the changes still be 
abrupt?

Ingo

-- 
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray    : http://members.home.nl/seed7/

Post a reply to this message