|
|
Op 14/02/2021 om 20:38 schreef Ash Holsenback:
> On 2/14/21 2:33 PM, Ash Holsenback wrote:
>> On 2/14/21 12:32 PM, Alain Martel wrote:
>>> Le 2021-02-14 à 11:02, Ash Holsenback a écrit :
>>>
>>>> another question: are variance, confidence and ratio valid in method
>>>> 3... given current narrative i'd say yes to the first two and no on
>>>> the last
>>>>
>>>> made some progress... here's what i have so far
>>>> http://wiki.povray.org/content/Reference:Sampling_Parameters_%26_Methods
>>>>
>>>
>>> The confidense and ratio are to adjust the samples numbers between
>>> the various intervals and are not used.
>>> As for variance, it also seems to be method 1 and 2 specific. It
>>> don't seems to have any effect when using method 3.
>>
>> are you sure about that... given that the narrative after Sampling
>> Method 3: uses the term variance, then later on in the narrative in
>> Sampling method 1: last paragraph ( above the note ) links variance
>> and confidence together... did i make a bad leap? the role of ratio is
>> a couple of paragraphs up... please expand on this a bit ;-)
>
> one more thing... would it be accurate to say that most if not all those
> media related keywords work for all three methods, however some of their
> roles have changed.
Give that man a beer!
Much better assuredly.
Pending more learned answers on your last question, I would be wary to
affirm this. The point being probably - if those are silently ignored by
method 3 as Alain states - that people will wring themselves into hoops
only to see some 'improvements' to their media, without any results
obviously. If, on the other hand, those are /not/ ignored, we need to be
dead sure about it. What does the code say, Mr Pokorny?
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|