POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.advanced-users : Whats wrong with this isosurface ? : Re: Whats wrong with this isosurface ? Server Time
29 Jul 2024 06:25:48 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Whats wrong with this isosurface ?  
From: JC (Exether)
Date: 12 Sep 2003 04:34:32
Message: <3f618518$1@news.povray.org>
The isosurface defined by a function f is equivalent to the isosurface 
defined by pow(f,2) if threshold it 0, so you should define your sphere 
more simply with the functions.inc function f_sphere (x,y,z,1) and you 
will see it.

JC

Peter Lang wrote:
> Hello,
> I am just trying to understand the function of isosurface .
> As I understand the surface of an object is just there where the function
> get zero
> So I get a simple sphere with the following:
> isosurface {  function { pow(x,2) + pow(y,2) + pow(z,2) - 1   }
> 
> But I thougt if I take the funktion to the sqare there should be no
> difference
> because the square of zero is still zero
> But
> isosurface {  function { pow( (pow(x,2) + pow(y,2) + pow(z,2) - 1) ,2)  }
> gives no object.
> please tell me why
> 
> peter
> 
>


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.