|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> So, question still remains why there are so much less samples?
the difference (between 6655 and 20714 samples ) is due to the final trace
full resolution at error_bound 0.1
I've re-done my first test, but this time with an abort of the render at the
end of pretrace and then compared the .rca (temporary radiosity save for
+C). This time, for both methods (2-pass and low_factor_error), the file
size is almost the same
M
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |