Vadim Sytnikov wrote:
> 
> 
> In fact, UDO files need not to represent your trees accurately. If fact,
> good UDO file should provide just a very basic information about how your
> model looks (or, if more exactly, what is its geometry, so that you would be
> able to scale/rotate/locate it in the Moray properly). It is accompanying
> INC files (containing actual SDL code) that contain the full model; UDO
> files [often] contain just a rough approximation.
> 
> 
> 

Yup! That's the way it could work. I remember Johannes Hubert's "Tree 
Designer" which supported UDO output.

@ Gena

How about a poll in the Moray groups?
http://news.povray.org/moray.win/
Maybe more Moray Users would be intereseted in UDO output.

Karl

Post a reply to this message