> You are correct. The answer is pretty simple: transform the normal by
> the transpose of the inverse of the transformation matrix.
> Ok, it's simple assuming you know some matrix math. ;-)
The *transpose* of the inverse?!? OMG! Wow. I'm going to think about that
for a while. Thanks! And thanks for the link =)
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|