"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> > What, assembly-language-like bytecode isn't good enough for you?
>   That's luxury!
>   The only valid input for functions should be opcodes written in hexadecimal!

I'm wondering, what kind of instruction word this ASM-interpreter uses ...

are they more CISC- or more RISC- like ? ...

BTW: What 'bout self-modifying code ? ... that would be nice ... back to oldschool

Post a reply to this message