> : by modifying the macro,
>
>   I think this is the best way to go.

Yes .... but a mesh2 optimised macro would mean a full rewrite of it, and
the math behind tetrahedrons are still too difficult for me.. I'm trying
something in between at the moment.. It might be another mad mans idea,
since I'm getting quite confused, but I'll post the further development..
Thanks for your input.  :o)

Hugo

Post a reply to this message