|
|
"John VanSickle" wrote:
> The only way that will be much faster is Newton's method, which
> involves taking the first-order derivative of the function.
> If that is too complicated, then the divide-and-conquer approach
> is as fast as you are going to get.
As it's apparent from the messages posted in this thread there's not one but
several "divide-and-conquer" approaches. (Unless "divide-and-conquer" is a
standardized term I'm not aware of.)
I only tried to divide in halves as I described, but have now learned that
there's much faster methods.
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|