"Ron Parker" wrote:
> I once did the math to figure out how to turn a
> matrix into a rotation, a scale, and a transform
> (provided it didn't have a significant skew
> component.) If you still need it (not that it
> looks like you do) I can email it to you or post
> it here.

My own problem is solved now, but it would be very interesting to see your
solution anyway! Mine did the rotation part only.

> (provided it didn't have a significant skew
> component.)

You can do that with rotate, scale and translate too. Actually I would guess
that any transformation can be done using those. Not that I need it... :-)

Greetings,

Rune

---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!

Post a reply to this message