|
|
Yes, but construct such a tree I would still have to test all points against the
current one, no? I can't construct the tree at generation time, because
consequent points are not necessarily spatially close (I'm talking about an
actual case here).
Perhaps I could start recursively subdividing the points along a set of
planes... But then I would not end up with a constant number of points in a
subset. I would have constant-volume subsets. How could I achieve the former
goal?
Margus
Chris Huff wrote:
>
> You might be able to make a macro which takes an array of objects as
> well as an array of their center positions and sorts them out into this
> tree structure. If you use MegaPOV, with min_extent and max_extent, the
> second array would be unnecessary.
> But there are probably better ways to do this. It isn't my idea, there
> were some discussions in these newsgroups a while ago about it...
>
> --
> Chris Huff
> e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
> Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|