Ken wrote in message <3774FF0F.D3AB7FF3@pacbell.net>...
>
>
>Nieminen Mika wrote:
>>
>> Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
>> : I once used a mesh of a woman and gave it totaly
>> : unrealistic porportions using the scale function. The distortion
caused
>> : by this was a very comical image when done.
>>
>>   So now we know what does Ken think about women... ;)
>>
>> --
>>
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
>> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*-
Warp -*/
>
>   Well let me just say that I believe many women are proportioned
>very nicely, bless their little hearts, while others could benefit
>from some serious rescaling efforts ;^ }

Agreed, my wife for one, a scale of <1.15,1.15,1.15> would make her
about 5' 6 1/4"
And yes, I did mean a uniform scale. [i.e the proportions are actually
fine until you place her next to other nearby
objects^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hpeople.]

And then there's Christine, who could really use a <0.3,1,0.3>...

Have Fun
Martin
--
<Spa### [at] tesseractcomau> is a valid address
If you prefer mnemonic addresses you can use:
<Martin 'at' tesseract.com.au> or <Martin.Crisp 'at' Tourism.tas.gov.au>

My opinions should not be taken as indicative of Tourism Tasmania's
opinions

Post a reply to this message