 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
news:4a2c3988$1@news.povray.org...
> On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:28:33 +0100, St. wrote:
>
>>> crazy, but if you only KNEW!!!!!!
>>
>> Then please tell.
>
> Gads, no, don't encourage him.
Why not? I thought I was going to learn something revelationary.
~Steve~
>
> Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:02 +0100, St. wrote:
> Why not? I thought I was going to learn something revelationary.
The day AQ has something revolutionary to share (something supportable)
is the day I eat my desk.
Ultimately it comes back to his standard rant about medicine = bad and
drugs = good. He's already been there once in this thread, and when he
first started this thread, I bet myself that he was going to eventually
end up there. Sure enough, I won that bet. ;-)
And then to preach "love love love" and then engage in personal attacks,
well, that strikes me as just a bit hypocritical.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
news:4a2e9f56$1@news.povray.org...
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:02 +0100, St. wrote:
>
>> Why not? I thought I was going to learn something revelationary.
>
> The day AQ has something revolutionary to share (something supportable)
> is the day I eat my desk.
No, I said 'revelationary', not 'revolutionary'. It's kind of the same
thing though apart from the term 'revelationary' in my opinion is probably
of higher regard in the contexts inferred, so I understand where you're
coming from.
> And then to preach "love love love"
Yeah well, the 'love love love' thing made me think that love was
discovered but there are insecurities too - that's all.
~Steve~
>
> Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:28:42 +0100, St. wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
> news:4a2e9f56$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:02 +0100, St. wrote:
>>
>>> Why not? I thought I was going to learn something revelationary.
>>
>> The day AQ has something revolutionary to share (something supportable)
>> is the day I eat my desk.
>
> No, I said 'revelationary', not 'revolutionary'. It's kind of the
> same
> thing though apart from the term 'revelationary' in my opinion is
> probably of higher regard in the contexts inferred, so I understand
> where you're coming from.
Ah, and here I thought it was a misspelling. Whoops. :-)
>> And then to preach "love love love"
>
> Yeah well, the 'love love love' thing made me think that love was
> discovered but there are insecurities too - that's all.
Makes sense to me. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:02 +0100, St. wrote:
>
> > Why not? I thought I was going to learn something revelationary.
>
> The day AQ has something revolutionary to share (something supportable)
> is the day I eat my desk.
>
> Ultimately it comes back to his standard rant about medicine = bad and
> drugs = good. He's already been there once in this thread, and when he
> first started this thread, I bet myself that he was going to eventually
> end up there. Sure enough, I won that bet. ;-)
>
> And then to preach "love love love" and then engage in personal attacks,
> well, that strikes me as just a bit hypocritical.
>
> Jim
You see only what you want to see. Get out the salt you'll need it, that's a dry
desk. The revolutionary part will always elude you, there's nothing even god can
do about that. One of the darkest I've met here, you and you're dark buddy Warp.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:02 +0100, St. wrote:
>
> > Why not? I thought I was going to learn something revelationary.
>
> The day AQ has something revolutionary to share (something supportable)
Exactly its must "supportable", because you cannot recognize the truth on you're
own.
> is the day I eat my desk.
You'll need Ketchup also.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
> news:4a2c3988$1@news.povray.org...
> > On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:28:33 +0100, St. wrote:
> >
> >>> crazy, but if you only KNEW!!!!!!
> >>
> >> Then please tell.
> >
> > Gads, no, don't encourage him.
>
> Why not? I thought I was going to learn something revelationary.
>
> ~Steve~
Want revelation? Truth is revealed to those with genuine eyes, and seeing with
the heart is critical. The heart sees what eyes cannot.
And it this kind of talk really that pisses off dark ones because their hearts
are blind. They cannot do it and never will. All their attacks on me were out
of their own frustration for their dark limitations.
Surely you can see story being repeated here. If only they had a cross and could
find me.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
alphaQuad wrote:
> The heart sees what eyes cannot.
My ribs?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Insanity is a small city on the western
border of the State of Mind.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:07:24 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> alphaQuad wrote:
>> The heart sees what eyes cannot.
>
> My ribs?
LOL, good one, Darren. I'm going to laugh about that the rest of the
afternoon now. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> alphaQuad wrote:
> > The heart sees what eyes cannot.
>
> My ribs?
>
> --
> Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
> Insanity is a small city on the western
> border of the State of Mind.
LOL yah, that's about it isn't. ROFL
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
