|
 |
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:28:42 +0100, St. wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote in message
> news:4a2e9f56$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:02 +0100, St. wrote:
>>
>>> Why not? I thought I was going to learn something revelationary.
>>
>> The day AQ has something revolutionary to share (something supportable)
>> is the day I eat my desk.
>
> No, I said 'revelationary', not 'revolutionary'. It's kind of the
> same
> thing though apart from the term 'revelationary' in my opinion is
> probably of higher regard in the contexts inferred, so I understand
> where you're coming from.
Ah, and here I thought it was a misspelling. Whoops. :-)
>> And then to preach "love love love"
>
> Yeah well, the 'love love love' thing made me think that love was
> discovered but there are insecurities too - that's all.
Makes sense to me. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
