|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:51:18 +0000, Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>> Wimp! :) I think that you've got to be quite determined to kill yourself if you
>> want to use a PSU for that.
>> Ouch! That woke me up is much more common than You deaded me.
>> Having said that you do need some common sense.
>
>http://www.xkcd.com/242/
LOL
The third branch and the correct one. It when he says "Yes, that's right". -
True.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> I mean sure things have got better superficially. I opened the case by
> hand rather then by screwdriver, and... um yeah that's about the only
> difference I noted.
That's because you haven't been around long enough to solder your own
components on the board. Two words: wire wrap.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> http://www.apple.com/xserve/raid/
You can get a Dell with stuff like that for $3000. It's not *that*
expensive. You can get a 4T hard drive case for like $250 or something
(without the 4T of drives, of course).
> If you buy something like a HP BladeCenter you can slot more CPUs, RAM,
> HDs, etc. into and out of it without even powering it off. But you can
Or buy a Tandem computer, where when a part fails, it dials up Tandem,
and they ship you a new one with instructions on where to put it, before
you even know it failed.
The ones that boggle my mind are the ones where you can upgrade the OS
without stopping any of the programs. I'm not quite sure how that works.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:47:20 -0000, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
did spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>> I mean sure things have got better superficially. I opened the case by
>> hand rather then by screwdriver, and... um yeah that's about the only
>> difference I noted.
>
> That's because you haven't been around long enough to solder your own
> components on the board. Two words: wire wrap.
Yes I'm not that old :-) Even with that looking at it from a non-geek
viewpoint compare the hardware then to the hardware now, repeat for the
'software'.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> http://www.apple.com/xserve/raid/
>
> You can get a Dell with stuff like that for $3000. It's not *that*
> expensive. You can get a 4T hard drive case for like $250 or something
> (without the 4T of drives, of course).
Oh, "only" $3,000. Bargin. ;-)
>> If you buy something like a HP BladeCenter you can slot more CPUs,
>> RAM, HDs, etc. into and out of it without even powering it off. But
>
> Or buy a Tandem computer, where when a part fails, it dials up Tandem,
> and they ship you a new one with instructions on where to put it, before
> you even know it failed.
Oh, that's cute. (Are they still going?)
> The ones that boggle my mind are the ones where you can upgrade the OS
> without stopping any of the programs. I'm not quite sure how that works.
Neither do I - but people claim that functional programming is going to
revolutionise the industry by making this kind of thing standard.
[insert sarcasm here]
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
]
> over voodoo dolls. Today you can pretty much just plug in a PCI card and
> *expect* it to work immediately - or at least as soon as you put the CD
> in. No IRQ conflicts, no driver mismatches, IT JUST WORKS!!
>
Unless you're the dumbass that used to work where I currently work and
plug in the card without first shutting down the computer. Yeah, that
magic smoke ... that's what used to make it work, you let it out.
Thankfully that person quit, saving the management the difficult task of
canning them. Not a single line of their code exists here, anymore,
either. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> And let's not even get started on all those USB goodies that YOU JUST
> PLUG IN AND THEY GO! It wasn't like that before. Had to turn off the
> whole PC to connect or disconnect anything...
If I had a nickel for every time that was patently false.
Sure, flash drives work easily enough, but any other piece of hardware
usually requires you follow a specific sequence before you even plug the
device in. Otherwise, Windows (not sure how this works on other
platforms) will do magically bad things, such as install a persistent
incorrect driver that takes several steps and a few sacrificed chickens
to remove.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>
> What, you'd like the CPU to teleport itself into the socket instead? :-D
>
Remember the days before ZIF sockets? Seat the processor, jam it down
with enough pressure to potentially crack the main board, and hope to
hell you didn't just bend half a dozen pins. Ohh, and there were also
fun memory upgrades, using individual DIP chips crammed into sockets.
And god forbid if you had to remove one... Then there was SIP modules,
with their delicate pins which you had to align precisely or you'd bend
one. SIMMs and DIMMs are a much better improvement, especially with the
lift and snap-in insertion that many have today. The straight down syle
still required some pressure to get them to click in, but removal is a
breeze.
>
> In the Old Days, if you suddenly plugged or unplugged a device, you
> would likely fry the interface circuitry. Today we use interfaces that
> are expressedly designed to support such actions. That one is purely a
> hardware thing. (Although obviously the software needs to support it too.)
>
Oh, you still can, today .. see above. That is the nice thing about USB
is that devices are hot-swappable. Of course, so are devices that hang
off of the serial port, or parallel port. (and they have been for a very
long time ...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Ouch! That woke me up is much more common than You deaded me.
> Having said that you do need some common sense.
Popping open a camera can have a similar effect. Most cameras have an
onboard flash, which means they have a rather sizable capacitor. Touch
the wrong thing ...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Stephen wrote:
>
>> Ouch! That woke me up is much more common than You deaded me.
>> Having said that you do need some common sense.
>
> Popping open a camera can have a similar effect. Most cameras have an
> onboard flash, which means they have a rather sizable capacitor. Touch
> the wrong thing ...
I did that!!!
I had a very old Polaroid camera, and its flash (looked like an optional
you had to plug). Bad idea touching things with the flash box open,
while it had batteries. Me: it has batteries, it's only 3v. My dad: no,
it also has a big capacitor with more energy. I clearly didn't listen.
The it actually did a big *flash*, in the middle of the air, a few cms
above where I touched. Legs shaking for around 10 minutes :D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |