![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
andrel wrote:
> Ok, this lacks some some subtleties, and yes, IANAL.
No doubt there are careers that take more study than lawyering does and
which are of a bigger general benefit to people, yes. I just wouldn't say
they're "without knowledge or skills". Indeed, in the US, I'm not sure you
can graduate from undergraduate college and actually be a lawyer without
additional study. Maybe you can, but I don't know anyone who didn't go back
to school for it.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 26-9-2009 21:04, Darren New wrote:
> andrel wrote:
>> Ok, this lacks some some subtleties, and yes, IANAL.
>
> No doubt there are careers that take more study than lawyering does and
> which are of a bigger general benefit to people, yes.
And earn significantly less money, which was sort of the point.
> I just wouldn't
> say they're "without knowledge or skills". Indeed, in the US, I'm not
> sure you can graduate from undergraduate college and actually be a
> lawyer without additional study. Maybe you can, but I don't know anyone
> who didn't go back to school for it.
I know what you mean. I am just simply a bit annoyed that there are so
much jobs that earn more than a real craftsman. In general I lament the
loss of skills that is going on here right now. Which makes me sad. At
the same time having to witness some very skilled craftsmen that really
know their materials to get laid off or pestered into a desk job makes
me angry. Add to that that the persons that did it made more money,
didn't know anything about what these craftsmen were doing and simply
decided that anything they made could be bought on the internet. Then
you know why I will make some unflattering remarks about some people for
the coming years.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 09/26/09 13:46, andrel wrote:
> the 80s, women often did it to find a husband). There may be a 'brutal'
> test at the end, but in physics we studied a lot more and still the
> percentage that graduates is way lower than in law.
The reason there are more lawyers than physicists is that society needs
more lawyers than they do physicists.
> Somebody once said: 'why would I study hard to be a physicist for 5
> years, while I can also do law and be the manager of a group of
> physicist, earn more, and have 4 years of partying at uni instead?'
> In the US you might add to that: why would I study hard to be a doctor,
> while I can also do law and sue them?
Lawyers managing physicists? How'd that happen. What kind of job do the
physicists have?
BTW, over here law school is graduate school, and you need to have some
degree prior to entering law school. It's fairly competitive (although I
won't try to equate it to physics in any way). And while they perhaps do
party (don't really know), law school is fairly demanding here.
--
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright
until you hear them speak.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Fredrik Eriksson wrote:
> http://fe79.myftp.org/misc/google_se.png
>
> Too bad our kids are so stupid...
I have to wonder just what, exactly, those results mean.
Are there really 35,000,000 web sites that ask the question, "Why are
Swedish people so good looking?"
Or is it that there are 35,000,000 web sites use each of those words
somewhere on their page?
Or is it inflated to boost someone's ego?
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
andrel wrote:
> From my personal experience I know that also the writing skills are far
> below what was thought in my days.
I actually saw an article recently about how writing skills are better
today than they were 20 years ago. Specifically, the ability of a
writer to adapt their work for their target audience.
Unfortunately, I can't remember where I read it, and google is giving me
too many unrelated links.
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> Somewhere somebody probably has all sorts of interesting statistics.
> Damned if I know how to find them though...
http://www.google.co.uk/intl/en/landing/internetstats/
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
news:4abee0c2$1@news.povray.org...
>I actually saw an article recently about how writing skills are better
>today than they were 20 years ago. Specifically, the ability of a writer
>to adapt their work for their target audience.
> Unfortunately, I can't remember where I read it, and google is giving me
> too many unrelated links.
It's about the Standford Study of Writing
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson
http://ssw.stanford.edu/
The obvious criticism of the study is that it's based on the writings of
Standford students, who are not the most illiterate bunch. The writing
skills of Standford students may be better, but what does it say on the
writing skills of the rest of the population? What rings true, however, is
that people write more, and that just having more venues to write (even if
it's just inane Youtube/4chan/fark comments) is better than not writing at
all.
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Gilles Tran wrote:
> It's about the Standford Study of Writing
> http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson
> http://ssw.stanford.edu/
> The obvious criticism of the study is that it's based on the writings of
> Standford students, who are not the most illiterate bunch. The writing
> skills of Standford students may be better, but what does it say on the
> writing skills of the rest of the population? What rings true, however,
> is that people write more, and that just having more venues to write
> (even if it's just inane Youtube/4chan/fark comments) is better than not
> writing at all.
Thanks, that's exactly the one I was thinking of :)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |