|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Kids. They always seem to have boundless energy, right? Us grown-ups can
> hardly keep up with them. Why is that?
>
Judging from my own experience, I'd guess that kids are just miserable.
I get every bit as fidgety when I have to go shopping with my wife or
when I have to go to a dance club or when I have to spend hour after
hour doing things that I don't want to do.
If I'd had a dollar for every time someone remarked what a nice guy I
was when I wasn't in school, I could have retired when I graduated.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> Not a hypothesis. Proven - as societies, Western societies are very
> sedentary, and as such, obesity hits those who aren't careful about it.
There's no doubt that Westerners are very sedentary.
Most people seem to think that youngsters are inherantly full of energy,
and that being tired and lathargic is in inevitable consequence of
growing up. My hypothesis is that this lack of energy is not in fact due
to age, but to being constantly forced to stand still, sit still, wait
around, etc.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible a écrit :
> Most people seem to think that youngsters are inherantly full of energy,
> and that being tired and lathargic is in inevitable consequence of
> growing up. My hypothesis is that this lack of energy is not in fact due
> to age, but to being constantly forced to stand still, sit still, wait
> around, etc.
I don't know, it seems pets follow the same pattern of behaviour, very
lively and foolish at the beginning, then settling down gradually. It's
not that they cannot move around and play anymore, just that they do it
less often. I don't think it's just us imposing that on them, for
example cats do that yet they take little heed of our orders ;-) I
wouldn't be surprised if wild animals did that too.
I think there are other things that might explain the activity of
youngsters. For one thing, they are growing physically, so maybe the
body needs this movement to form properly. The brain is also developing
at this age, and possibly it needs as many stimuli as possible...
--
Vincent
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Vincent Le Chevalier wrote:
>
> I don't know, it seems pets follow the same pattern of behaviour, very
> lively and foolish at the beginning, then settling down gradually. It's
> not that they cannot move around and play anymore, just that they do it
> less often. I don't think it's just us imposing that on them, for
> example cats do that yet they take little heed of our orders ;-) I
> wouldn't be surprised if wild animals did that too.
>
But they freakin' stay in fit. That lazy-looking cat can still run to
catch a bunch of mice and go hiding to the attic without any problems.
Or that rabbit that never moves can still jump 2+ meters without
pre-acceleration - from right there, where it just sits still.
Every once in a while i wonder how they do it...
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> But they freakin' stay in fit. That lazy-looking cat can still run to
> catch a bunch of mice and go hiding to the attic without any problems.
> Or that rabbit that never moves can still jump 2+ meters without
> pre-acceleration - from right there, where it just sits still.
>
> Every once in a while i wonder how they do it...
Ever tried to catch goldfish?
6 months of the year, they never go past about 0.02 MPH. But the one day
you want to catch one... suddenly they can do 4 complete circuits of the
tank in under 800 ms. o_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:46:31 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> Not a hypothesis. Proven - as societies, Western societies are very
>> sedentary, and as such, obesity hits those who aren't careful about it.
>
> There's no doubt that Westerners are very sedentary.
>
> Most people seem to think that youngsters are inherantly full of energy,
> and that being tired and lathargic is in inevitable consequence of
> growing up. My hypothesis is that this lack of energy is not in fact due
> to age, but to being constantly forced to stand still, sit still, wait
> around, etc.
Ah, I see - I missed that that was your hypothesis.
I think it's not so much being forced to stand still (I wasn't, but I was
taught how to behave in public settings, which it seems at least here
where I live isn't something that is taught enough), but partly a mass-
>engergy conversion. Kids are small, so doesn't take as much fuel to
power them as it does someone my shape and size.
A 1500 calorie diet (as an example of pulling a number out of thin air)
for me is enough for me to probably sit in front of a computer for 8
hours and that's about it. If I want to be working out, I need more like
2500 calories of intake per day.
But for an average 10-year-old kid, 1500 calories is quite a bit and that
energy has to go somewhere.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> But for an average 10-year-old kid, 1500 calories is quite a bit and that
> energy has to go somewhere.
ADHD stands for attention defeciLETS ALL GO RIDE BIKES!!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:09:15 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> But for an average 10-year-old kid, 1500 calories is quite a bit and
>> that energy has to go somewhere.
>
> ADHD stands for attention defeciLETS ALL GO RIDE BIKES!!
FTW! Thanks, I needed the laugh today. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> But for an average 10-year-old kid, 1500 calories is quite a bit and
>>> that energy has to go somewhere.
>> ADHD stands for attention defeciLETS ALL GO RIDE BIKES!!
>
> FTW! Thanks, I needed the laugh today. :-)
http://www.bash.org/?22094
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:39:32 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>>> But for an average 10-year-old kid, 1500 calories is quite a bit and
>>>> that energy has to go somewhere.
>>> ADHD stands for attention defeciLETS ALL GO RIDE BIKES!!
>>
>> FTW! Thanks, I needed the laugh today. :-)
>
> http://www.bash.org/?22094
I really need to go up there more frequently and read stuff. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |