POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Mission: improbable Server Time
6 Sep 2024 13:18:42 EDT (-0400)
  Mission: improbable (Message 71 to 80 of 127)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Epic win
Date: 23 Apr 2009 16:44:27
Message: <49f0d32b$1@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:32:04 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:

>>> Now, if I could just learn to not be terrified of all human beings,
>>> maybe I'd be getting somewhere! :-}
>> 
>> You're making progress.  :-)
> 
> I am?

Yes, you are.  You're asking and talking to people, that's a huge step 
forward.

> Right now I'm just miserable because she hasn't contacted me yet... :-(

Now we need you to learn patience. :-)  You could always drop in the 
restaurant for dinner one night....

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Epic win
Date: 23 Apr 2009 16:55:21
Message: <49f0d5b9@news.povray.org>
Darren's summed it up pretty well....

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:44:36 -0400, Warp wrote:

> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> Maybe there, but not here...not everyone in the US has one.  Many
>> people who live in the US don't, even though they're legal.
> 
>   I can't understand how that can work. The most prominent problem which
> comes to mind is: How do they collect taxes if they don't know who is
> who? How can employers inform the government who is working for them if
> the employees have no ID? (At least here employers have a rather strict
> duty to have very accurate paperwork on who is working and every single
> cent is accounted for and notified, mostly for taxing and insurance
> purposes but also for other things, such as ensuring employee rights and
> such.)

No SSN != No ID in the US.  But most (not all) IDs are issued by the 
state and not by the federal government.

For foreign workers, for example, there are other ways and methods used 
to report that information.

>> > as it's an unambiguous unique identifier (and the government has your
>> > data associated with it).
> 
>> Over here we tend to be suspicious (some would say "overly suspicious")
>> of the idea of a national identity database.  Governments around the
>> world have demonstrated that they're not terribly good at keeping data
>> that should secure secured.  Though the most recent examples I can
>> think of are from he UK....
> 
>   One can be suspicious of a government that wants to keep accurate
> information on every single citizen of the country, but I really can't
> understand how a country can work without that. The Finnish government
> (and I'm sure it's the same for many other countries) knows the exact
> number of Finnish citizens, and their basic info (date of birth, etc.)

We do a census every 10 years to find out how many people there are 
here. :-)

Looking at my credit report (not managed by the government but by three 
separate reporting bureaus), they all don't have the correct address for 
me.  But they still track my credit without too much trouble - and I know 
that, because I check it at least monthly.

>   That might sound a bit draconian when said like that, but I have yet
> to feel that being abused. 

You're not in the US.  Finland has what I certainly would consider to be 
reasonable privacy laws.

> It seems to work quite well. One situation
> where the government knowing who you are works pretty well is in, as the
> name implies, social security. For example if you break a leg, you just
> go to the hospital, tell your social security number, and they fix you
> up for free. No hassle.

Ah, socialism that works. :-)  Seriously, I admire the health care system 
you guys have, and wish we had something similar instead of the crappy 
insurance-based system we have now.  Granted, having insurance is better 
than not.

Out of curiosity, how much of your salary goes to taxes?  Over here it's 
typically in the 30-40% range.

>   Naturally phonebooks are an exception to this. But even with them you
> always specifically choose whether you want your number on the public
> phone book or not when you create a phone contract. (And later you can
> change this with one phone call.)

We do have an option to be unlisted, but that doesn't stop abuses.  Right 
now there seems to be a dearth of telemarketing companies that skirt the 
DNC list rules - like saying they're calling to do a survey (legal) when 
the point of the survey is to see if you want to buy something (not 
legal).  Or political/charity organizations.  Or people who just refuse 
to identify who they're with or play by the rules.

We had one the other day who insisted that they were legally required to 
NOT disclose the name of the charity they were calling on behalf of, 
except to the named person they were calling (they claimed my wife had 
"done business with" the charity in the past).  

I had another who just identified himself by name, and when I asked who 
he was calling on behalf of, he gave me his name again and asked if my 
wife was home.  I asked a second time and in a more demanding tone who he 
was calling on behalf of, and he said something like "national 
registry" (I actually couldn't make it out).  I told him to take us off 
their calling list - which they're required by law to do if you ask - and 
he actually started to argue before giving up, saying OK and hanging up.

It doesn't help that there are certain categories of numbers that we 
cannot block at all.  We have to make a note in our phone's electronic 
phonebook to have it display the note when hey call (as if it were the 
caller ID).

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Epic win
Date: 23 Apr 2009 17:12:07
Message: <49f0d9a7$1@news.povray.org>
>>>> Now, if I could just learn to not be terrified of all human beings,
>>>> maybe I'd be getting somewhere! :-}
>>> You're making progress.  :-)
>> I am?
> 
> Yes, you are.  You're asking and talking to people, that's a huge step 
> forward.

On Tuesday it felt like a huge step. But...

<Smith>What good is a phone number if it doesn't do anything</Smith>

>> Right now I'm just miserable because she hasn't contacted me yet... :-(
> 
> Now we need you to learn patience. :-)  You could always drop in the 
> restaurant for dinner one night....

I intend to.

...but I'd like to avoid looking like I'm stalking her. o_O

Patience is one thing, but what if it's not really her number? What if 
she doesn't remember who I am? What if she just doesn't want to talk to me?

But... nobody *forced* her to give me the number, so...?

AAARRGH! I'm so *confused*! >_<

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Epic win
Date: 23 Apr 2009 18:07:49
Message: <49f0e6b5@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:12:10 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:

>>>>> Now, if I could just learn to not be terrified of all human beings,
>>>>> maybe I'd be getting somewhere! :-}
>>>> You're making progress.  :-)
>>> I am?
>> 
>> Yes, you are.  You're asking and talking to people, that's a huge step
>> forward.
> 
> On Tuesday it felt like a huge step. But...

It was, and it is.

> <Smith>What good is a phone number if it doesn't do anything</Smith>

Sometimes life gets in the way.  Maybe someone in her family got sick or 
died.  Who knows?  Try not to assume it's because it's you.

>>> Right now I'm just miserable because she hasn't contacted me yet...
>>> :-(
>> 
>> Now we need you to learn patience. :-)  You could always drop in the
>> restaurant for dinner one night....
> 
> I intend to.
> 
> ...but I'd like to avoid looking like I'm stalking her. o_O

Certainly, but if it's a restaurant you like going to for the food, then 
just go for the food.  If she's working that night, she is, and if she 
isn't, oh well, at least you got a good meal. :-)

> Patience is one thing, but what if it's not really her number? What if
> she doesn't remember who I am? What if she just doesn't want to talk to
> me?

You can what-if yourself to death.  So stop it.  Just be relaxed and 
groovy and see what happens.  And keep on dancin'.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Fizzle
Date: 27 Apr 2009 16:55:07
Message: <49f61bab$1@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v8 wrote:

> Ladies and gentlemen, tonight I went out for a meal. It turns out that 
> my waitress was quite cute, and definitely very friendly. Long story 
> short: I now have her phone number.

Well, it _is_ her number. Unfortunately it's not going to do me much good.

I suggested to her that maybe we could meet up today. Her response was 
that she's trying to "sort things out" with her boyfriend so it's 
"probably not a good idea".

To summarise:

1. She already has a boyfriend, so she's not going to improve my 
lovelife (e.g., by allowing me to *have* one...)

2. She's not going to hang out with me either, so she's not going to 
improve my social life.

*sigh* So I now have another name to add to the list of people I 
sometimes contact electronically but almost never get to actually meet 
up with. Yay, me.

What a disappointing result...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim Cook
Subject: Re: Fizzle
Date: 27 Apr 2009 17:38:44
Message: <49f625e4$1@news.povray.org>
"Orchid XP v8" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> 1. She already has a boyfriend, so she's not going to improve my 
> lovelife (e.g., by allowing me to *have* one...)

What, a boyfriend?

(you walked right into that)

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Fredrik Eriksson
Subject: Re: Fizzle
Date: 27 Apr 2009 18:23:01
Message: <op.us2ggnw47bxctx@e6600>
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:38:35 +0200, Tim Cook <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Orchid XP v8" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> 1. She already has a boyfriend, so she's not going to improve my  
>> lovelife (e.g., by allowing me to *have* one...)
>
> What, a boyfriend?

http://basicinstructions.net/?p=322


-- 
FE


Post a reply to this message

From: nemesis
Subject: Re: Fizzle
Date: 27 Apr 2009 21:25:29
Message: <49f65b09$1@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> 
>> Ladies and gentlemen, tonight I went out for a meal. It turns out that 
>> my waitress was quite cute, and definitely very friendly. Long story 
>> short: I now have her phone number.
> 
> Well, it _is_ her number. Unfortunately it's not going to do me much good.
> 
> I suggested to her that maybe we could meet up today. Her response was 
> that she's trying to "sort things out" with her boyfriend so it's 
> "probably not a good idea".
> 
> To summarise:
> 
> 1. She already has a boyfriend, so she's not going to improve my 
> lovelife (e.g., by allowing me to *have* one...)

Besides, would you really want to be boyfriend of a girl who gives her 
phone number to any numbface in the cafeteria? :P

not that it's that uncommon!


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Fizzle
Date: 28 Apr 2009 04:29:11
Message: <49f6be57$1@news.povray.org>
> http://basicinstructions.net/?p=322

Gaaaaahahahahaaaaaaaaargh!! >_<


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Fizzle
Date: 28 Apr 2009 04:30:00
Message: <49f6be88$1@news.povray.org>
nemesis wrote:

> Besides, would you really want to be boyfriend of a girl who gives her 
> phone number to any numbface in the cafeteria? :P

Maybe she only gave it to me because I'm *special*? :-P


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.