POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Epic (and expensive) failure Server Time
6 Sep 2024 15:19:42 EDT (-0400)
  Epic (and expensive) failure (Message 51 to 60 of 68)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 8 Messages >>>
From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 05:20:00
Message: <web.49ba251c5031099e6dd25f0b0@news.povray.org>
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> > dude people can WALK 4.6 miles in 1.2 hours!
>
> Er, yeah, right.

Well I used to walk to work at my last job, that was almost 2 miles and I could
do it in under 25 mins if I pushed it.

> As I recall, last time we want on a school trip that was a 5 mile walk,
> it took an entire day to walk it. (But then, that *was* 5 Mr Martin
> miles...)

I once walked almost 20 miles in a day. Over hills. 10 miles is a good distance
for a day walk.

> Does whinging count as "exercise"?

Depends on the volume ;-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Chambers
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 05:32:31
Message: <49ba282f$1@news.povray.org>
On 3/12/2009 2:58 AM, Warp wrote:
>    I lost 22 kg in 7 months by eating healthy and exercising. A medical
> examination afterwards confirmed that all my physical stats (eg. blood
> counts) were improved.
>
>    I wrote about this in detail here:

Good job!  How are you doing at keeping it off?

Personally, I haven't yet motivated myself to lose weight, despite 
"knowing" that I need to.  I currently weigh 253, but I just have to 
many other things to worry about at the moment.  It's a lazy excuse, I 
know, but it's how I feel.

-- 
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Chambers
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 05:37:00
Message: <49ba293c$1@news.povray.org>
On 3/12/2009 6:33 AM, Invisible wrote:
> The classes are one hour, not two. One hour, once a week.

One hour, 3 times a week is better.  Or 30 minutes, 5 times a week, but 
recent research suggests the first is healthier.

> (Actually, on reflection, if I had a time machine I wouldn't use it to
> find out if I'd still get fat... More like, go back in time, bitch-slap
> myself, and radically alter a few life choices!)

Ever see the movie Daywatch?  There's a line in there I love... a 
villain is offered the opportunity to correct any of his past mistakes, 
which he declines.  His associate asks him, "You don't make mistakes?" 
to which he replied, "I don't regret them."

Fact is, if you had made different choices, you wouldn't understand the 
necessity of those choices.  It's the act of making mistakes that 
teaches you not to; to quote conventional wisdom, "it's the burnt hand 
that teaches best."

-- 
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 05:39:48
Message: <49ba29e4$1@news.povray.org>
>> (Actually, on reflection, if I had a time machine I wouldn't use it to
>> find out if I'd still get fat... More like, go back in time, bitch-slap
>> myself, and radically alter a few life choices!)
> 
> Ever see the movie Daywatch?  There's a line in there I love... a 
> villain is offered the opportunity to correct any of his past mistakes, 
> which he declines.  His associate asks him, "You don't make mistakes?" 
> to which he replied, "I don't regret them."
> 
> Fact is, if you had made different choices, you wouldn't understand the 
> necessity of those choices.

No, I wouldn't. But I'd be *happy* instead of being miserable. I think I 
could live with being happy but not knowing why. :-P

> It's the act of making mistakes that 
> teaches you not to; to quote conventional wisdom, "it's the burnt hand 
> that teaches best."

Being killed is a *really* ineffective way to learn about the dangers of 
landmines. :-P


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 05:45:11
Message: <49ba2b27@news.povray.org>
>> dude people can WALK 4.6 miles in 1.2 hours!
>
> Er, yeah, right.

4.6 miles in 1.2 hours is 3.8 MPH, that is brisk walking pace, I guarantee 
you that most people would be able to manage that WALKING with no prior 
training.  That is unbelievably slow for a bike, are you sure you got those 
figures correct?


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 05:51:55
Message: <49ba2cbb$1@news.povray.org>
>>> dude people can WALK 4.6 miles in 1.2 hours!
>>
>> Er, yeah, right.
> 
> 4.6 miles in 1.2 hours is 3.8 MPH, that is brisk walking pace, I 
> guarantee you that most people would be able to manage that WALKING with 
> no prior training.  That is unbelievably slow for a bike, are you sure 
> you got those figures correct?

It might be 4.2 miles or 4.8 miles or something, but it was definitely 
just under 5 miles. And the time might not be exactly 1.2 hours, but it 
was a little over 1 hour.

I specifically remember computing my average speed and being 
dissapointed by it. (Especially since during the downhill parts, my 
speedometer registered 20 MPH or more.)

Indeed, every morning I'd get out of bed, have my breadfast, and be out 
of the door while my little sister lay sound asleep in bed. Half an hour 
later I'd cycle past her school and she'd be there on her bike chatting 
to her friends. I never could figure out how the hell she got there so 
fast, or how she got in front of my without passing me.

I think the problem is that the route is uphill in both directions. 
(Despite this obviously being physically impossible.) Perhaps it *would* 
in fact be faster to walk it. Cycling uphill is absurdly hard.


Post a reply to this message

From: andrel
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 06:15:00
Message: <49BA3226.8090509@hotmail.com>
On 12-3-2009 10:58, Warp wrote:
>   I lost 22 kg in 7 months by eating healthy and exercising. A medical
> examination afterwards confirmed that all my physical stats (eg. blood
> counts) were improved.

YKYHBRTTL when you try to loose exactly pi kilo's per month.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 07:35:03
Message: <g5hkr4tk2jikhhosds41tu45ogl849iv3h@4ax.com>
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:15:02 +0100, andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

>On 12-3-2009 10:58, Warp wrote:
>>   I lost 22 kg in 7 months by eating healthy and exercising. A medical
>> examination afterwards confirmed that all my physical stats (eg. blood
>> counts) were improved.
>
>YKYHBRTTL when you try to loose exactly pi kilo's per month.

LOL Nicely spotted. 
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 07:38:29
Message: <49ba45b5$1@news.povray.org>
andrel wrote:

> YKYHBRTTL when you try to loose exactly pi kilo's per month.

Most people just try to loose the pie kilos. ;-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Epic (and expensive) failure
Date: 13 Mar 2009 12:23:50
Message: <49ba8896$1@news.povray.org>
Chambers wrote:
> Ever see the movie Daywatch? 

Daywatch and nightwatch were fabulous movies. So totally non-Hollywood in 
their execution. I never got around to looking up what the russian words 
written in chalk were saying - I'll have to watch that again.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   My fortune cookie said, "You will soon be
   unable to read this, even at arm's length."


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 8 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.