![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Thank you, I enjoyed it a lot. Of course - like Tom Austin said - people
who don't play piano will not notice how difficult it is to hit it just
right - even more so on an organ with heavy keys I guess (?). And they
compare it to professional performances and hear the glitches, but you
shouldn't care about that.
Perfectionism can be a bitch sometime. If you go by that, there is always
someone who is better in that specific task. Better do the things you
enjoy and look, how you improve compared to yourself and don't compare
yourself to others.
I play trombone myself. I know, that compared to some other "more
professional amateur" trombone players it's probably not "good enough",
but I enjoy doing it. It gives me something, which I miss, if I don't
play for some time. And I keep steadily improving.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> I think you'd be hard-pressed to play a virtuoso on that particular
> organ.
Aye, that's what she said.
Seriously, tho, I'd be hard-pressed to play a scale on that particular
organ. :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Well, for a start I only played 2 of the 3 staffs in that particular
>> performance... I *have* a recording of me playing the other two.
>
> Your spelling seems to have improved a bit recently (do you use a spell
> checker now?). Your math still is somewhat shaky.
Thunderbird has a built-in spell checker. But for some reason it doesn't
work. (It tells me all words are mispelt.)
My math? Now do you mean mathematics or arithmetic? I *know* my
arithmetic sucks! :-S
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
> Seriously, tho, I'd be hard-pressed to play a scale on that particular
> organ. :-)
No - the *keys* would [have to be] hard-pressed. ;-)
Did I mention being half-frozen? It's a stone-built church! In October!
I was shivering like hell... (Hence the very un-fashionable clothing...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Florian Pesth wrote:
> Thank you, I enjoyed it a lot.
Well that's certainly what I'm aiming for!
> Of course - like Tom Austin said - people
> who don't play piano will not notice how difficult it is to hit it just
> right - even more so on an organ with heavy keys I guess (?). And they
> compare it to professional performances and hear the glitches, but you
> shouldn't care about that.
What I would be interested to know... compared to a propper performance,
does my rendition sound "recognisibly" like the real time?
I always think that if a tune is similar enough that people recognise
what it is, that's a solid way to start.
> I play trombone myself. I know, that compared to some other "more
> professional amateur" trombone players it's probably not "good enough",
> but I enjoy doing it. It gives me something, which I miss, if I don't
> play for some time. And I keep steadily improving.
The truly astounding thing about this toccata is just how far I've come.
When I first started trying to play it, it was painfully slow and
mechanical. There were parts of it where I knew the notes but I
literally couldn't play those parts because it was just too hard. And
look at me now! I played the entire thing, end to end, with no gaps at
all. (OK, actually I missed about half a bar at the end. So shoot me!)
Parts which seemed impossibly hard just weeks ago now slow past with
effortless grace.
I haven't reached that stage with all of the score yet. My next
challenge is getting both hands working. I've made some good progress.
Maybe I'll post a video for that too...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> What I would be interested to know... compared to a propper performance,
> does my rendition sound "recognisibly" like the real time?
Yes, it is recognizable. I couldn't tell you the name if you didn't tell
me, but that is because I don't listen so much to classical music at home
(But for some time I went to performances of the local symphonic
orchestra (it was cheap as a student) and my sister played piano. I think
I have a good musical memory.).
>
> I always think that if a tune is similar enough that people recognise
> what it is, that's a solid way to start.
It sure is! I would think that already the different response of the keys
makes it a completely different (and more difficult) to play. Do you have
chance of getting there more often and getting used to the instrument?
>
>> I play trombone myself. I know, that compared to some other "more
>> professional amateur" trombone players it's probably not "good enough",
>> but I enjoy doing it. It gives me something, which I miss, if I don't
>> play for some time. And I keep steadily improving.
>
> The truly astounding thing about this toccata is just how far I've come.
> When I first started trying to play it, it was painfully slow and
> mechanical. There were parts of it where I knew the notes but I
> literally couldn't play those parts because it was just too hard.
Yeah, muscle memory is amazing, isn't it? But without it I guess you
really couldn't play time critical parts on any instrument - it is just
to fast to think about it.
> And
> look at me now! I played the entire thing, end to end, with no gaps at
> all. (OK, actually I missed about half a bar at the end. So shoot me!)
> Parts which seemed impossibly hard just weeks ago now slow past with
> effortless grace.
>
> I haven't reached that stage with all of the score yet. My next
> challenge is getting both hands working. I've made some good progress.
> Maybe I'll post a video for that too...
Do you take (or took) classes or are you learning completely on your own?
Maybe it would help to take some lessons (not necessarily regulary, but
sometimes it is good to get some hints and correct some mistakes).
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=T4Z-mokvpoo
That sounds great! Better than I would be able to play it :)
Also good job on getting a decent video quality for YouTube (it looked quite
good), although it started to screw up near the end just as I was typing
this sentence :D
BTW, the way you wrote the video title, you probably WILL get 12 year olds
saying you suck. People who would click on "nerd playing the organ" are the
people who would then post saying "haha nerd!". Don't be so hard on
yourself.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 05-Nov-08 22:49, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Well, for a start I only played 2 of the 3 staffs in that particular
>>> performance... I *have* a recording of me playing the other two.
>>
>> Your spelling seems to have improved a bit recently (do you use a
>> spell checker now?). Your math still is somewhat shaky.
>
> Thunderbird has a built-in spell checker. But for some reason it doesn't
> work. (It tells me all words are mispelt.)
Strange, mine works. It tells me e.g. that in your message the only word
that is misspelled is mispelt
> My math? Now do you mean mathematics or arithmetic? I *know* my
> arithmetic sucks! :-S
I think arithmetic may be more accurate for 2+2=3 but OTOH I though that
it was generally referred to as maths. I am not a native though.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> (Seriously... 7 attempts to make the file upload?? How on earth does so
> much stuff get onto YouTube when it's this hard to post anything?!)
Try it from work? I've uploaded a few videos on our 2MBit SDSL connection
and it's pretty quick :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Mike the Elder wrote:
> It's nice to know I'm not the only organ music fan hereabouts.
> (I just listen and, to the great benefit of all, do not play.)
> Thanks for the post. I quite enjoyed it.
Yay. :-D
Gotta love the power and majesty of a large, fully-working organ. What
other purely accoustic instrument can send ladies' handbags scurrying
across the floor like startled rodents?
> Here's a quick link to something by my favorite organist (and Moog
> synthesizer player)E. Power Biggs:
>
> http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=GVu0auaZu7s
I'll have to wait until I get home to play that...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |