 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:51:30 -0400, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msn com> wrote:
>He said the cheese 'actually made it
>milder.' I'm taking his word for it.
I think that it would, any fatty additive does. Traditionally people use yogurt
and/or coconut.
I don't know about taste, though :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
> With the wife and daughter out of town, my son and I are 'cooking' for
> ourselves. I brough back a coupla beef burritos and had them with a
> Odawalla Mango Tango chilled over a stack of icecubes in a tall glass.
> My son cooked up a pot of prepacked curry and threw about a quarter
> pound of grated cheese in with it. I thought the result doubtful at
> best, and strangely pungent. He said the cheese 'actually made it
> milder.' I'm taking his word for it.
Curry with cheese? It doesn't sound very appetizing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Jim Charter wrote:
>
>> With the wife and daughter out of town, my son and I are 'cooking' for
>> ourselves. I brough back a coupla beef burritos and had them with a
>> Odawalla Mango Tango chilled over a stack of icecubes in a tall glass.
>> My son cooked up a pot of prepacked curry and threw about a quarter
>> pound of grated cheese in with it. I thought the result doubtful at
>> best, and strangely pungent. He said the cheese 'actually made it
>> milder.' I'm taking his word for it.
>
>
>
> Curry with cheese? It doesn't sound very appetizing.
It smelt downright vile.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Curry with cheese? It doesn't sound very appetizing.
<ducks>
It can't be as bad as curry on its own!
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Curry with cheese? It doesn't sound very appetizing.
You should try paneer curry if you get the chance then, it can be quite
good, though the cheese is admittedly pretty dissimilar to cheddar.
Relatedly, I have yet to eat anything that didn't taste good with
cheese, so I can totally see why he'd do this.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news: 4887f3fc$1@news.povray.org...
>, it can be quite good, though the cheese is admittedly pretty dissimilar
>to cheddar.
I don't think I get that ... do you mean that cheeses dissimilar to cheddar
are unlikely to be good?
Then please define "good" ;-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
m_a_r_c wrote:
> news: 4887f3fc$1@news.povray.org...
>
>
>>, it can be quite good, though the cheese is admittedly pretty dissimilar
>>to cheddar.
>
>
> I don't think I get that ... do you mean that cheeses dissimilar to cheddar
> are unlikely to be good?
> Then please define "good" ;-)
>
I think he meant that the taste of cheddar may not compliment the taste
of curry well, but a different flavoured cheese might be okay with it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
488827c5@news.povray.org...
> m_a_r_c wrote:
>> de news: 4887f3fc$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>>
>>>, it can be quite good, though the cheese is admittedly pretty dissimilar
>>>to cheddar.
>>
>>
>> I don't think I get that ... do you mean that cheeses dissimilar to
>> cheddar are unlikely to be good?
>> Then please define "good" ;-)
>>
> I think he meant that the taste of cheddar may not compliment the taste of
> curry well, but a different flavoured cheese might be okay with it.
That way?
"it can be quite good, though, the cheese is admittedly pretty dissimilar
to cheddar."
It means something completely different doesn't it? :-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
> m_a_r_c wrote:
>> message de news: 4887f3fc$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>>
>>> , it can be quite good, though the cheese is admittedly pretty
>>> dissimilar to cheddar.
>>
>>
>> I don't think I get that ... do you mean that cheeses dissimilar to
>> cheddar are unlikely to be good?
>> Then please define "good" ;-)
>>
> I think he meant that the taste of cheddar may not compliment the taste
> of curry well, but a different flavoured cheese might be okay with it.
Apparently I need to give mote thought to my sentence construction. I
didn't realize this was worded so badly!
At any rate, Jim got what I intended. The latter part of the sentence,
"though the cheese is admittedly pretty dissimilar to cheddar" was
intended to be interpreted like the following:
"Although I have just said that paneer curry is delicious, I am aware
that paneer and cheddar are very different cheeses, so it is entirely
possible that your son's cheddar curry would not taste very good"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24-Jul-08 11:52, m_a_r_c wrote:
> 488827c5@news.povray.org...
>> m_a_r_c wrote:
>>> de news: 4887f3fc$1@news.povray.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>> , it can be quite good, though the cheese is admittedly pretty dissimilar
>>>> to cheddar.
>>>
>>> I don't think I get that ... do you mean that cheeses dissimilar to
>>> cheddar are unlikely to be good?
>>> Then please define "good" ;-)
>>>
>> I think he meant that the taste of cheddar may not compliment the taste of
>> curry well, but a different flavoured cheese might be okay with it.
>
> That way?
> "it can be quite good, though, the cheese is admittedly pretty dissimilar
> to cheddar."
>
> It means something completely different doesn't it? :-)
>
I think it can mean both things.
Either: "it can be quite good, *although* the cheese is admittedly
pretty dissimilar to cheddar."
or: "it can be quite good, *even though* the cheese is admittedly pretty
dissimilar to cheddar."
but I am only a non-native speaker.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
