 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Michael Raiford wrote:
>
> Heh, 10 minutes with the tablet, and I came up with this lame excuse of
> a character .. Hmmm, modeled after the Simpsons characters, I think.
>
I looked at the picture before I read your text and though I saw Fry.
http://csl.sublevel3.org/jp2a/gallery/fry.jpg (ok, that's made with
ASCII, but it's the closest look of Fry with quickGoogle)
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:25:41 +0200, Nekar wrote:
>> Well, I didn't think that - but that's because I know that without
>> drafting tools, I suck at drawing. I was an engineering student in
>> college, and took a couple of drafting classes, so if I need to do an
>> orthographic view on paper, I have the equipment to draw it on paper.
>
> At drafting I always figured out the difficult parts that were supposed
> to catch you out - it the proccess sometimes making silly mistakes on
> the basic stuff... :-P
Yep, that's very true.
>> But if I need to draw a face, forget it - I just can't manage that.
>>
>>
> My art teacher in school forced me to do lots of faces. The result: I
> find doing faces boring, but I'm very good at it - especially getting a
> good resemblance.
I never took an art class that focused on that - the last one I did take,
I think, was in 7th grade.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:19:18 -0600, Michael Raiford wrote:
> Hmmm, modeled after the Simpsons characters, I think.
I was thinking that it kinda resembled Millhouse, but without the
overbite.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
For everybody's enjoyment, I'll post a little drawing of mine. Got a
Graphire4 this weekend and it's fantastic. Saves a lot of paper ("Save
the Woods!") and the hassle of scanning.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'opa_1.png' (141 KB)
Download 'opa_2.png' (130 KB)
Download 'opa_3.png' (97 KB)
Download 'opa_4.png' (127 KB)
Preview of image 'opa_1.png'
Preview of image 'opa_2.png'
Preview of image 'opa_3.png'
Preview of image 'opa_4.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> That's a hell of a lot better than I could do.
>
> Ditto.
>
> Heck that looks like the first comics.
Yay! I've found something I don't suck at! :-D
I just sat down and drew Scott - and it looks like Scott! w00t! Now I
almost look talented. Heh.
[Aside from the minor detail that I'm simply copying somebody else's
creative genius photocopier-style.]
Seriously, you try drawing a person's face, and the result looks
*nothing* like them! One time, I even tried to draw Pikachu. (Don't
ask.) It looked completely wrong. But for some reason, I can draw
characters from Ctrl+Alt+Del and they look right... yays!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've just added Scott to the set. Did it real quick, but it's instantly
recognisable as Scott, which has got to be a good thing!
I also had a go at drawing some stuff with the GIMP. But the problem I
instantly ran into is that drawing with a mouse is virutally impossible.
The lines are all disgustingly wobbly and uneven.
Damn, now I remember why I usually stick with vector graphics! (But then
of course you have to spend countless hours playing with Beizer curves
which never ever look quite how you want them to...)
Either way, I can't even draw *lines* as nicely as Tim does! (I wonder
suck at drawing...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> One time, I even tried to draw Pikachu. (Don't
> ask.) It looked completely wrong.
Try drawing Garfield. Or Donald Duck. Surprisingly difficult.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> I also had a go at drawing some stuff with the GIMP. But the problem I
> instantly ran into is that drawing with a mouse is virutally impossible.
> The lines are all disgustingly wobbly and uneven.
That's why people use graphics tablets...
(Although using a very large resolution and zooming in can help a bit.)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Damn, now I remember why I usually stick with vector graphics! (But then
> of course you have to spend countless hours playing with Beizer curves
> which never ever look quite how you want them to...)
Try scanning in your hand-drawn work and fitting the beziers over the top.
> Either way, I can't even draw *lines* as nicely as Tim does! (I wonder
> at drawing...)
What tool are you using in the GIMP? In most art programs you get some sort
of smoothed line tool that smooths out the lines you draw with the mouse.
Even in MS PowerPoint you get a freehand tool that smooths out squiggly
lines you draw with the mouse - you could use that then screenshot and
import to GIMP for further processing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Try drawing Garfield. Or Donald Duck. Surprisingly difficult.
Hmm... Donald Duck... Let me see now...
Attempt #1: EPIC FAIL.
Attempt #2: Fail.
Attempt #3: EPIC FAIL.
Attempt #4: Fail.
Nope, it's no good. I ph413. I simply can't get that mouth shape
correct. It's too crazy... Attempt #2 looks *vaguely* reminiscent of
him, but the others are just nowhere near.
*throws paper away*
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
