 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Michael Raiford <mra### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
> Michael Raiford wrote:
> > * This is actually pretty bare-bones photoshop usage. He uses all
> > brushes, layers, and an occasional scale operation, nothing too fancy.
yes, indeed. The only real source of amazement here is his fancy input toy...
> * Another neat trick, having a file with various facial features at the
> ready.
I thought only He-man animators in the past used such cheap trick! ;)
> The thing I didn't know you could do was
> warp the text like that...
even the open-source inkscape warps the text. Speaking of which, this was done
with no fancy input other than the mouse... inkscape's caligraphic drawing tool
is getting better by the day... much better than GIMP's... :)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'face.png' (136 KB)
Preview of image 'face.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> The hardest part of making a web comic is to get good ideas.
Indeed. And given how much I suck at having ideas, I think I should just
forget the whole thing right now...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> You can get a tablet PC that's got a touchscreen
I think that the difference between a tablet PC with touchscreen and
a graphics tablet with an LCD is that the latter is much more accurate
and has extra properties (such as detecting pressing strength and tilting).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> You can get a tablet PC that's got a touchscreen
>
> I think that the difference between a tablet PC with touchscreen and
> a graphics tablet with an LCD is that the latter is much more accurate
> and has extra properties (such as detecting pressing strength and tilting).
If the tabletpc has a wacom digitizer (and most do), it has pressure
sensitivity. Not as much as the Cintiq; 256 vs. 1024...and if one had
tilt sensing I would be all *sha-wing!* and buy it.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.digitalartsuk.com
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> If the tabletpc has a wacom digitizer (and most do),
Mine does, not that I do enough artwork for it to make a difference. The
protective glass is thick enough that I'd expect it would be an effort
to get used to doing it for art. It's almost difficult to pick out
letters on the on-screen keyboard reliably. You have to watch the cursor.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
news:47c88e7e$1@news.povray.org...
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:25:25 -0500, Warp wrote:
>
> >> [I was actually toying with the idea of making a web comic of my own.
> >
> > The hardest part of making a web comic is to get good ideas.
>
> Actually, the hardest part of making a comic (web or not) is to get good
> ideas. I don't imagine that the medium makes it any easier or harder.
>
For me the hardest part is finding time to do it. I have many projects in my
head and nothing to show for it :-P
--
- Nekar X -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>
>> The hardest part of making a web comic is to get good ideas.
>
> Indeed. And given how much I suck at having ideas, I think I should just
> forget the whole thing right now...
>
Like anything else, it just takes practice. The more you do it, the
better you are at it.
Besides, looking through the archive of Ctrl-Alt-Del, the first few
months weren't worth reading, anyway. He took some time to find his
stride; what makes you think you wouldn't, too?
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Michael Raiford wrote:
> After watching the first video, I noticed a few things
>
> * This is actually pretty bare-bones photoshop usage. He uses all
> brushes, layers, and an occasional scale operation, nothing too fancy.
Are you *kidding* me? This is the most advanced thing I've ever seen! o_O
> * It amazes me how he seems to get it right the first time.
The thing that struck me is how often he redraws stuff...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
47cbc398$1@news.povray.org...
> Are you *kidding* me? This is the most advanced thing I've ever seen! o_O
You should replace o_O by (oYo)
G.
--
*****************************
http://www.oyonale.com
*****************************
- Graphic experiments
- POV-Ray, Cinema 4D and Poser computer images
- Posters
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> > * This is actually pretty bare-bones photoshop usage. He uses all
> > brushes, layers, and an occasional scale operation, nothing too fancy.
> Are you *kidding* me? This is the most advanced thing I've ever seen! o_O
Clearly you have never used an image manipulation program to its full
extent. Even the Gimp has many of the features showcased in that video
(although, admittedly, some of them are not as easy to use).
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
