 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:25:14 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>
>> [And I have to give 3 months' notice.]
>
> What notice do they have to give you?
None, IIRC.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:59:46 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:25:14 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>
>>> [And I have to give 3 months' notice.]
>>
>> What notice do they have to give you?
>
>None, IIRC.
Don't you think that what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander?
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:30:30 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>
>>> Well, no, you just had to stop somewhere in order to open or close the
>>> window.
>> Why? Unless of course you're talking about non-driver's windows when
>> no-one is sitting there.
>
> Well have *you* ever tried to wind the window while the car is moving?
Well yes I can also walk and chew gum at the same time.
> I mean, sure, it's great if you're *trying* to drive along a slalum
> course...
And this action is different to fiddling with the CD/Radio how? I'm not
saying I'd do it while turning a corner, but then would you be trying to
open your electric window while driving around a corner?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:14:46 -0000, scott <sco### [at] laptopcom> did
spake, saying:
>>> Well, no, you just had to stop somewhere in order to open or close the
>>> window.
>>
>> Why? Unless of course you're talking about non-driver's windows when
>> no-one is sitting there.
>
> And unless you are really rich and have a huge car, you can just lean
> over and do the passenger window by hand whilst you're driving.
Uh no that'd take you away from the driving position and uh yes I'm
guessing you're being sarcastic.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>>> [And I have to give 3 months' notice.]
>>> What notice do they have to give you?
>> None, IIRC.
>
> Don't you think that what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander?
/Invisible is horribly lost/
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I mean, sure, it's great if you're *trying* to drive along a slalum
>> course...
>
> And this action is different to fiddling with the CD/Radio how?
Pressing a button an a radio doesn't require bruit strength.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Really? I thought electric motors were more efficient than internal
> combustion engines, and hence should use power more slowly...
The problem is that in petrol/diesel you can store much more energy per unit
weight than you can with batteries, even after taking into account the
better efficiency of the electric system. To carry around enough batteries
to match the amount of useful energy in 50 litres of diesel wouldn't be
practical at the moment.
> [And I don't care how many figures you pay me, I don't *want* to be the
> director of anything! Far too much pressure...]
Unfortunately, higher paid jobs usually come with more
responsibility/pressure...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:11:39 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
>>> I mean, sure, it's great if you're *trying* to drive along a slalum
>>> course...
>> And this action is different to fiddling with the CD/Radio how?
>
> Pressing a button an a radio doesn't require bruit strength.
No it requires concentration which is what I thought you were pointing to.
If you require that much strength to wind down a window you're either a
wimp or got problems with your windows.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>> Really? I thought electric motors were more efficient than internal
>> combustion engines, and hence should use power more slowly...
>
> The problem is that in petrol/diesel you can store much more energy per
> unit weight than you can with batteries, even after taking into account
> the better efficiency of the electric system. To carry around enough
> batteries to match the amount of useful energy in 50 litres of diesel
> wouldn't be practical at the moment.
I see... Hence the hydrogen fuel cells and so forth?
>> [And I don't care how many figures you pay me, I don't *want* to be
>> the director of anything! Far too much pressure...]
>
> Unfortunately, higher paid jobs usually come with more
> responsibility/pressure...
Well yeah - the high paid jobs are high paid because no sane person
would want to do them. ;-)
Anyway, currently I have a low-paid job that no sane person would want.
If I can find a somewhat higher-paid job that's less obnoxious I'd be
happier.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> And lo on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:11:39 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
> spake, saying:
>
>>>> I mean, sure, it's great if you're *trying* to drive along a slalum
>>>> course...
>>> And this action is different to fiddling with the CD/Radio how?
>>
>> Pressing a button an a radio doesn't require bruit strength.
>
> No it requires concentration which is what I thought you were pointing
> to. If you require that much strength to wind down a window you're
> either a wimp or got problems with your windows.
No, it's just hard to physically crank a stiff window handle while
holding the steering wheel straight.
I suppose they could gear the mechanism down really really far to make
it lighter... or just have electric windows. :-D
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
