On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:53:00 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:43:33 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>  
>did spake, saying:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:16:16 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>
>>> And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:25:03 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>
>>> did spake, saying:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:46:58 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>>>> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Blasphemer! Stone them, stone them!
>>>>
>>>> Why should the Blasphemers get all the fun :)
>>>
>>> Just one (other) mistranslation and things could have been so different
>>> "As punishment for your blasphemy, and as prescribed by our Holy Book,  
>>> you
>>> must smoke your way through this entire baggie of grass until you are
>>> thoroughly stoned"
>>
>> They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
>>
>> Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
>
>Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P
>

LOL (in a Welsh accent)


>>> Unless you're a zombie, or a ghost, or a vampire, or a werewolf... oh  
>>> wait
>>> that last one's just stupid; werewolves aren't dead.
>>
>> Are you some sort of ist? What do you have against Duppies?
>
>Nothing, I think they're great for an aquarium.
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duppy

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

???... does all this mean that I get to mess up my wings?

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:20:48 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:04:34 -0000, bluetree <nomail@nomail> did  
>spake, saying:
>
>> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>>> > They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
>>> >
>>> > Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
>>>
>>> Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P
>>
>> It's the same as with other titles. The more Saints he get the more  
>> miracles he
>> can do, am I right? ;)
>
>So miraculous they named a road after him - St. St. St.
>
>-- 
>Phil Cook

I'm still here you know. I do take sugar.

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:20:48 -0000, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
> >And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:04:34 -0000, bluetree <nomail@nomail> did
> >spake, saying:
> >
> >> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
> >>> > They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
> >>> >
> >>> > Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
> >>>
> >>> Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P
> >>
> >> It's the same as with other titles. The more Saints he get the more
> >> miracles he
> >> can do, am I right? ;)
> >
> >So miraculous they named a road after him - St. St. St.
> >
> >--
> >Phil Cook
>
> I'm still here you know. I do take sugar.
>
> Regards
>  Stephen


Sorry! It's only respect not to talk directly to a Saint. :)
Does he also take some milk? <- really not respectless dear Sir Saint Stephen,
I hope, he won't get angry... ;)

Regards
             bluetree

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:35:54 EST, "bluetree" <nomail@nomail> wrote:

>
>Sorry! It's only respect not to talk directly to a Saint. :)

Now I know what foot you kick with. Not that I care :)

>Does he also take some milk? <- really not respectless dear Sir Saint Stephen,
>I hope, he won't get angry... ;)

You wouldn't know but that is a phrase used to show the invisibility of the
disabled.
Instead of asking the person in a wheelchair if he takes sugar. The carer is
asked if he (the disabled person) takes sugar.
And no I don't take milk, but I take sugar in my first cup of coffee and all of
my cups of tea if it is Indian tea not Green tea which I take with neither sugar
nor milk. I will put an ice cube into my tea or coffee to cool it down as I
don't take milk, unless it is espresso or Greek type coffee then I sometimes add
lots of sugar. It is probably better to ask someone else. :)

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

In article <web.479b10cbe1d0580ad77696980@news.povray.org>, 
nam### [at] gmailcom says...
> Tim Cook <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > Darren New wrote:
> > > Then the answer would be "no", not "yes". :-) If the place doesn't
> > > exist, then asking whether there's something at that place would be
> > > answered "no". Do the taxi drivers on the moon accept tips? No.
> >
> > According to my philosophy 101 teacher at university, you can validly
> > say anything about nonexistent things.  All unicorns are chartreuse, no
> > harbl which has a frobotz is virpo, that kind of thing.  So the taxi
> > drivers on the moon both do and do not accept tips.
> 
> indeed.  Wu/Mu is the correct answer to such questions.
> 

Actually, this reminds me of a blog entry I read today which talked 
about the difference between lies, bullshit and spin.

Basically:

Lies - Require you know the truth, so you can try to convince people 
that something else is true instead. This is easily refuted, since all 
someone has to do it prove that the truth is something else.

Bullshit - Making things up, out of thin air, with no basis in truth at 
all, other than needed to convince someone that it *might* be somehow 
connected to the real world. This is damn hard to refute, since how do 
you prove that there *is* truth, as related to something that doesn't 
exist? How do you even prove that it didn't happen, didn't exist, etc.?

Spin - Something between the two above. Its purpose is to lie where 
needed to imply that black is white, up is down, right is left, good is 
bad, etc., but with a large dribble of bullshit added in, which can't be 
easily refuted, disproven or tested. Thus, the lies get support from the 
stuff you can't examine, while the stuff you can't examine is made more 
probable by the suggestion that "if it exists/happened/etc.", the lies 
must be true. As a result, the nuts that believe the bullshit will 
believe both, and the people that fall for the lies are more easily led 
into also accepting the bullshit.

-- 
void main () {

    if version = "Vista" {
      call slow_by_half();
      call DRM_everything();
    }
    call functional_code();
  }
  else
    call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message

In article <479c72c5$1@news.povray.org>, Sabrina Kilian <"ykgp at 
vtSPAM.edu"> says...
> Tim Cook wrote:
> > So the taxi drivers on the moon both do and do not accept tips.
> > 
> 

> the trip, or even if you ever arrived.
> 
lol Got to remember that one.

-- 
void main () {

    if version = "Vista" {
      call slow_by_half();
      call DRM_everything();
    }
    call functional_code();
  }
  else
    call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message

In article <op.t5m1okjkc3xi7v@news.povray.org>, 
phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk says...
> And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:22:57 -0000, bluetree <nomail@nomail> did 
 
> spake, saying:
> 
> > "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
> >> It's got those harps and clouds and the fullsome sense of smugness  
> >> caused
> >> by being there.
> >>
> >> Okay in all seriousness if everyone thinks the same way in Heaven then
> >> it's possible that the only way in is to display those same traits on
> >> Earth. Therefore you have no free will nor free will to lose you are
> >> simply repeating your Earthly actions in Heaven. If you were the type 
of
> >> person to become disatisfied with that then you wouldn't have been  
> >> allowed
> >> in. Satan/Lucifer/Adversary doesn't count as he was always in Heaven.
> >
> > Not to sound blasphemous.
> 
> Blasphemer! Stone them, stone them!
> 
> > But who says that there are individuals. If there might be no free will
,  
> > it could also be, that there are no individuals... (invalid logic, but 
 
> > doesn't matter)
> > I can't imagine a lot of individuals playing all time similar or same 
 
> > songs with harp. ;)
> 
> No you're right they could all Become One With The Mind Of God... ooooo! 
 
> Or separate from God in a shiny silvery gestalt from which multiple forms
  
> can be made and rule over a race of warriors who... oh wait sorry that's 
 
> Deep Space Nine.
> 
> > "the fullsome sense of smugness caused by being there" sounds like ther
e  
> > might be something, which changes the way you are. -> So no individual 
 
> > anymore? ;)
> 
> Hmm think about the types of people who you'd expect to get into Heaven, 
 
> would you want to spend eternity with them in any form? So the person  
> who's there either a) wants to be there b) has to be there, or is c)  
> stoned.
> 
> Back to the serious bit. I think the gestalt or 'one with the mind of God
'  
> is a possibiity if you think of each individual joining as a voice in the
  
> choir, similar to that voice in your head telling you that you shouldn't 
 
> eat that gooey cream pie or take a machine-gun to your co-workers...um...
  

This would differ from our understanding of modern neuroscience in what 
way, I mean other than the fact that, with rare exceptions, most of the 
other people in our heads don't get the final vote on what to do, but 
just chime in a lot? And what would the point of that be "for" God? 
Having billions of chattering voices chiming in about all the stuff they 
want him to do next all the time, where his sole gain from that is 
that... he gets to *pick* which ones to listen to, but without all the 
complex neurological filters "we" have that are supposed to make the 
crazier people in our own heads stay quiet. People without those filters 
(or rather with broken ones) tend to be what we call bipolar, and other 
similar disorders. One minute they are listening to the devil on the 
shoulder, the next the angel, and they *personally* can't tell the 
difference. Always thought God had to be completely nuts, by the crazy 
definitions given for his behavior, but gluing billions of people, each 
with their own collection of crazy people in them, into a mess that 
hasn't got the filters we do, would **make** any such entity nuts, if it 
wasn't to start with.

-- 
void main () {

    if version = "Vista" {
      call slow_by_half();
      call DRM_everything();
    }
    call functional_code();
  }
  else
    call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message

Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Spin - Something between the two above. 

Actually, I've always understood "spin" to be picking which part of the 
story to tell. Like foods that proclaim "fat free!" when they're loaded 
with sugar.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     On what day did God create the body thetans?

Post a reply to this message

Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:35:54 EST, "bluetree" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>
> >
> >Sorry! It's only respect not to talk directly to a Saint. :)
>
> Now I know what foot you kick with. Not that I care :)

NO! I'm not kicking anybody. Not even a fly. In that way I'm a kind of Buddhist.
I would also turn the other cheek for the fly... ;)

> >Does he also take some milk? <- really not respectless dear Sir Saint Stephen,
> >I hope, he won't get angry... ;)
>
> You wouldn't know but that is a phrase used to show the invisibility of the
> disabled.
> Instead of asking the person in a wheelchair if he takes sugar. The carer is
> asked if he (the disabled person) takes sugar.

^^
I knew it. :P
(I googled the phrase.) :)

> And no I don't take milk, but I take sugar in my first cup of coffee and all of
> my cups of tea if it is Indian tea not Green tea which I take with neither sugar
> nor milk. I will put an ice cube into my tea or coffee to cool it down as I
> don't take milk, unless it is espresso or Greek type coffee then I sometimes add
> lots of sugar. It is probably better to ask someone else. :)
>
> Regards
>  Stephen


What's about white coffee?
BTW have you also tried green tea with gold? :)

Regards
               bluetree

Post a reply to this message