Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:20:48 -0000, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
> >And lo on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:04:34 -0000, bluetree <nomail@nomail> did
> >spake, saying:
> >
> >> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
> >>> > They don't call me Saint Stephen for nothing.
> >>> >
> >>> > Actually they don't call me Saint Stephen at all, at all :)
> >>>
> >>> Ah St. St. so good they named him twice:-P
> >>
> >> It's the same as with other titles. The more Saints he get the more
> >> miracles he
> >> can do, am I right? ;)
> >
> >So miraculous they named a road after him - St. St. St.
> >
> >--
> >Phil Cook
>
> I'm still here you know. I do take sugar.
>
> Regards
>  Stephen


Sorry! It's only respect not to talk directly to a Saint. :)
Does he also take some milk? <- really not respectless dear Sir Saint Stephen,
I hope, he won't get angry... ;)

Regards
             bluetree

Post a reply to this message