 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune <aut### [at] runevision com> wrote:
> However, Internet Explorer 6 (being quite old, but still widely used) still
> renders certain things very strangely.
Transparent PNGs + IE = sucks.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think "clear both" is buggy in IE7
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200603/new_clearing_method_needed_for_ie7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"stbenge" wrote:
> I tested your site with IE7, and I see a couple of rendering errors. The
> first occurs at every 'box'. It manifests as a continuance of the
> left/right box graphics extending below the bottom graphic (shown in
> attached image).
Eep, that's even worse than in IE6! How could that happen...?
> I also get the unshaded left border at each box. All
> these boxes are affected by the unshaded left border: 'Fractal Structure
> And Some Red', 'Burn in Hell', 'No More Chrome Spheres Please', 'Merry
> Christmas on The South Pole', 'Tunnel', 'Impossible Triangle', 'Red
> Dragon', 'Tubes', 'Torus Fractal', 'Green Dragon' and 'Pens'.
Yeah, it's all the ones where the image to the right extends lower down than
the text, for some reason.
> I hope this helps.
It helps me take it extra seriously, when I know that IE7 hasn't fixed these
issues as I had hoped. :(
>> Any idea how to fix it?
>
> Yeah, convince the world not to use IE :)
I need something a bit quicker... ;)
> P.S. I'm still finding (good) uses for your Illusion include file!
That's nice to hear, and yeah, it's basically just a projection, so I guess
it is versatile. If you have any images online that uses it, I could link to
them in my "Outside Gallery" if you'd like.
Rune
--
http://runevision.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" wrote:
> Transparent PNGs + IE = sucks.
I thought it was fixed in IE7? For IE6 I am feeding the browser transparent
gifs instead.
Rune
--
http://runevision.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune wrote:
>> Transparent PNGs + IE = sucks.
>
> I thought it was fixed in IE7? For IE6 I am feeding the browser transparent
> gifs instead.
Yes, translucent PNGs actually work in IE7 (and, based on my limited use
of it, they seem to work quite well).
As you've seen, however, CSS is still horribly broken. I can't even
tolerate doing any sort of web design work anymore thanks to IE. :(
--
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Attwood" wrote:
>I think "clear both" is buggy in IE7
> http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200603/new_clearing_method_needed_for_ie7/
I didn't see any solution I could understand in that article, but the
problem was indeed "clear:both".
Now I've reverted to using some good old tables, and everything works fine
in IE 6 and Firefox 2.
http://runevision.com/temp/new_design_test.htm
The menu items to the right are far more spaced in IE than in Firefox
though. Don't know why.
Also, could someone with IE 7 let me know if the problem with the bottom of
the boxes is still there?
Rune
--
http://runevision.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:21:49 +0100, "Rune" <aut### [at] runevisioncom> wrote:
>Also, could someone with IE 7 let me know if the problem with the bottom of
>the boxes is still there?
Looks ok with IE 7.0. 5730. 11
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" wrote:
> "Rune" wrote:
>> Also, could someone with IE 7 let me know if the problem with the
>> bottom of the boxes is still there?
>
> Looks ok with IE 7.0. 5730. 11
Thanks! :)
Rune
--
http://runevision.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stbenge nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2008/01/20 01:48:
> Rune wrote:
>
>> This page works fine in Firefox 2.0:
>> http://runevision.com/temp/new_design_test.htm
>
> I use FF 2.0.0.3 and I see no problems.
>
>> However, when I view it with IE 6 some of the boxes are completely
>> white, or flickers white, and they also have a white, unshaded left
>> border. I have really no idea what causes this, and haven't been able
>> to find help on the net (I don't know what to search for).
>>
>> Do you see the same artefacts in IE? Are you using IE6 or IE7?
>
> I tested your site with IE7, and I see a couple of rendering errors. The
> first occurs at every 'box'. It manifests as a continuance of the
> left/right box graphics extending below the bottom graphic (shown in
> attached image). I also get the unshaded left border at each box. All
> these boxes are affected by the unshaded left border: 'Fractal Structure
> And Some Red', 'Burn in Hell', 'No More Chrome Spheres Please', 'Merry
> Christmas on The South Pole', 'Tunnel', 'Impossible Triangle', 'Red
> Dragon', 'Tubes', 'Torus Fractal', 'Green Dragon' and 'Pens'.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
>> Any idea how to fix it?
>
> Yeah, convince the world not to use IE :)
>
> Sam
>
> P.S. I'm still finding (good) uses for your Illusion include file!
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Page open side by side in both Firefox 2.0.0.11 and IE7. They both look
identical, apart from a 1 point font size difference. No graphycal glitch or
anomaly here.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
You know you've been raytracing too long when whenever you write include, even
in essays, etc, you always add a "#".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rune wrote:
> "Tim Attwood" wrote:
>> I think "clear both" is buggy in IE7
>> http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200603/new_clearing_method_needed_for_ie7/
>
> I didn't see any solution I could understand in that article, but the
> problem was indeed "clear:both".
>
> Now I've reverted to using some good old tables, and everything works fine
> in IE 6 and Firefox 2.
> http://runevision.com/temp/new_design_test.htm
>
> The menu items to the right are far more spaced in IE than in Firefox
> though. Don't know why.
I tested your site again with both FF 2.0.0.3 and IE 7, and I see no
such difference.
> Also, could someone with IE 7 let me know if the problem with the bottom of
> the boxes is still there?
I found neither hide nor hair of the pesky white boxes. It would appear
that you have managed to eradicate that particular problem. In fact, the
page actually looks *better* in IE due to the automatic antialising of
page fonts.
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
