 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:16:00 -0600, "GreyBeard" <r.b### [at] sbcglobal net>
wrote:
>
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>news:euup401au6u37lrkgn8tad8lk88elcqh9r@4ax.com...
>
>Would the admin please be kind enough to sent this turkey to the trash where
>he belongs? Posting in formats that most can't see and then saying it's the
>fault of everyone else is rather discourteous, not to mention egotistical
>and schizophrenic.
More quack diagnosis.
Pay attention to what I was actually saying. It's the fault of people
if they cannot be bothered to determine wherher or not they should
support a format. Dismissing it at first hand without thinking about
it is their fault.
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> writes:
> 8k is still significant to those on dial-up.
...but untold amounts of bytes in flame-wars are insignificant.
--
http://arose.hopto.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09 Mar 2004 01:52:10 +0200, Artis Rozentals <art### [at] aaaapollolv>
wrote:
>IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> writes:
>
>> 8k is still significant to those on dial-up.
>
>...but untold amounts of bytes in flame-wars are insignificant.
Well duh. Like this really has many meaning to anyone out there in
meatspace. Taking this for something serious will seriously make you
look dumb.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 16:02:30 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
wrote:
>IMBJR wrote:
>> Try not to make such bizarre generalisations. You don't know enough
>> about me to make that statement.
>
>And you've insulted everyone else here in the same way. So?
Insults are not bizarre generalisations - not the ones I use anyways.
They are neat little summaries of a person's foibles.
>
>> Such a ploy has never stopped me posting my images.
>
>What a shame.
LOL
>
>> You really think having a dialup is lazy?
>
>Sure. As lazy as not downloading broken software to try to see images
>that the person posting doesn't even care if you can.
You really are quite odd aren't you? Just can't accept what I say on
this subject of dial-up. Making it some sort of rejoiner is too
bizarre really. Get yourself some air.
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:bb0q40leif2781gqsib3mn0ltgm10a7jrg@4ax.com...
>
> Pay attention to what I was actually saying. It's the fault of people
> if they cannot be bothered to determine wherher or not they should
> support a format. Dismissing it at first hand without thinking about
> it is their fault.
>
I have. What you have been trying to get across is something like "I am
right, the rest of the world is wrong". Like all the others that believe as
you do, you have about a snowballs chance in a blast furnace of being right
on any subject. You will never have anything to post that would be worth
putting experimental software in an already unstable system. (Windoze 98,
unstable since '98 and worse with the upgrades.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <ttop40d82d4j7k29msodrklpq3mjom2a5k@4ax.com>,
IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> >Then why waste the POV-Team's webspace with your images? You have your own
>
> This is a newserver not a web server. Dear me, if this is how you
> start your rant you've already lost major respect-possibilities.
It is both a news server and a web server, among other things. You're
picking on a meaningless detail and missing the point (again), which is
that you are being rude and wasting space that belongs to someone else.
You are abusing a freely provided service and spoiling it for other
users, you can expect people to object when you do so.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <slpp40982tstpohrhd2g29df0qe4voselv@4ax.com>,
IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> Just because this is a single node, does not make it any less a part
> of usenet. If your mind cannot conceive of such a topology, think of
> this place as a zit that stands alone from the head of the network.
Listen: this server is not a "node" of USENET. It is entirely separate
from that network.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <cktp40lls455qv549e005icm6fr2ftpv26@4ax.com>,
IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> Now you give the greater detail. Sheeh! Dear me. I think you need to
> leave if you cannot get it right first time.
Why? You're the one causing trouble. I don't think anyone here would be
sad to see you leave. I would be very glad to see that happen. In fact,
I will state it as a personal request: Please leave, now, and never come
back.
That was a personal request, as a user of these newsgroups. Now, as a
TAG member: Do not *ever* tell other users of this server they should
leave. Do not even imply it. You are on very thin ice here. We have
tolerated your abuse of this server so far, but we will not tolerate
attempts to chase away legitimate users. Posting here is a privilege,
not a right, you are here at the sufferance of the server
administration. Abuse these privileges badly enough and they will be
removed. If you will not leave voluntarily, I very strongly suggest that
you straighten up your act and actually listen to what people are
telling you.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:hvpp409be19v8cc3i503js1qtqr4ov2fla@4ax.com...
>
> Believe you me that would not work with me. I've had that happen to me
> in other places - again, due to the clique-gone-mad syndrome.
Thank you for the confession of being a proven troll. It's quite refreshing
when my first impressions are correct, and by your own words.
Secondly, what you mean is we're not the first group you've insulted
everyone and anyone.
Lastly, my Binford Mark 5 Turbo flamethrower may not be in usage here, but
that's my choice.
(Set target control on Troll, level on Vaporize)
Lennie the Lurker
President and Public Relations Officer
Whack-A-Loon, Ink.
Makers and Purveyors of Fine Quality Loon Mallets.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:ttop40d82d4j7k29msodrklpq3mjom2a5k@4ax.com...
> Was it actually a problem or was it more as per here, a new format? If
> it was a problem then your comparison is void.
Different format, MPEG2 rather than MPEG1, higher quality, but unless you
have the codecs installed, impossible to see.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
