 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I went back and looked again. You're right. I think I clicked on the
scroll bar to page down some because the first section didn't seem
important, only the questions and answers below the dashed line.
I probably broke a rule of netiquette right there by not reading that
"Note".
Bob
"Peter J. Holzer" <hjp### [at] SiKitu wsracat> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] tealhhjpat...
| On Sat, 13 May 2000 17:10:45 -0500, Bob Hughes wrote:
|
| You did read that note at the beginning, did you?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message
news:391ec6fb$1@news.povray.org...
> I see your point and would agree, but I suspect it does not apply in this
> case: Setting up a free e-mail service is usually not done by someone
> completely new to the internet.
Why not? It is not that difficult. Many people access the Internet because
they want an e-mail. Maybe Mr Koester got himself an e-mail only because of
this particular question.
I know spam is not agreable to get, but I agree with Gilles: we are
over-reacting. Mr Koester did apologize.
Povingly,
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 13 May 2000 18:19:16 -0500, Chris Huff wrote:
>This particular mistake(gathering hundreds of e-mail addresses and
>mass-mailing to them) is not normally something beginners would be able
>to figure out...by the time they are advanced enough to do this, most
>people have hopefully developed better manners.
What I don't get is why I didn't get one. It's not as though I haven't
posted to every group on this server, plus CGRR. Maybe I just come
across as unhelpful. :)
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker wrote:
> What I don't get is why I didn't get one. It's not as though I haven't
> posted to every group on this server, plus CGRR. Maybe I just come
> across as unhelpful. :)
I would be more than happy to forward you my copy of it. I don't want
you feeling left out or anything :)
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>
> In article <391D9188.270F04CA@inapg.inra.fr> , Gilles Tran
> <tra### [at] inapginrafr> wrote:
>
> > For somebody who is new to the
> > internet, the very concept of spam doesn't mean anything.
>
> I see your point and would agree, but I suspect it does not apply in this
> case: Setting up a free e-mail service is usually not done by someone
> completely new to the internet.
>
Hi Thorsten!
I would agree to Gilles and Marc Koester would not be the first person
getting a free account due to the help of friends or family. I did this
at least twice for friends.
Even so the error has been a big one I wouldn't take it too seriously
this time.
If he repeats this stunt I would ask for a UDP or whatever would be
possible on this server).
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ron Parker" <ron### [at] povrayorg> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] linuxparkerrfwicom...
> On Sat, 13 May 2000 18:19:16 -0500, Chris Huff wrote:
> >This particular mistake(gathering hundreds of e-mail addresses and
> >mass-mailing to them) is not normally something beginners would be able
> >to figure out...by the time they are advanced enough to do this, most
> >people have hopefully developed better manners.
>
> What I don't get is why I didn't get one. It's not as though I haven't
> posted to every group on this server, plus CGRR. Maybe I just come
> across as unhelpful. :)
IMHO it means that M. Koester collected the adresses one by one, "manually",
copy/paste... (which would invalidate Chris' interpretation).
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 May 2000 15:36:54 +0200, Philippe Debar wrote:
>
>"Ron Parker" <ron### [at] povrayorg> wrote in message
>news:slr### [at] linuxparkerrfwicom...
>> On Sat, 13 May 2000 18:19:16 -0500, Chris Huff wrote:
>> >This particular mistake(gathering hundreds of e-mail addresses and
>> >mass-mailing to them) is not normally something beginners would be able
>> >to figure out...by the time they are advanced enough to do this, most
>> >people have hopefully developed better manners.
>>
>> What I don't get is why I didn't get one. It's not as though I haven't
>> posted to every group on this server, plus CGRR. Maybe I just come
>> across as unhelpful. :)
>
>IMHO it means that M. Koester collected the adresses one by one, "manually",
>copy/paste... (which would invalidate Chris' interpretation).
Maybe he deliberately excluded povray.org addresses. If that is the case,
he probably knew what he was doing was wrong.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
>
> Please don't post binary attachments to non-binaries groups. Thanks.
He has even mailed it to me and a hundred others :-(
Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Koester wrote:
>
> Dear readers,
>
> I read the statements about my person. I apologize by everyone who
> feels disturbed by my questions!
Ok, accepted, but whys on earth did you mass-mail it, too?
I also thought about complaining to GMX and closing your account.
> I learned how to behave correctly and will never do that again!
> And mistakes are human and we all learn from them!
Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Markus Becker" <mar### [at] studentuni-siegende> wrote in message
"Ignorance protects against punishment not"
Looks like Yoda is working for babelfish.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
