|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tell me what you think of my povray CD idea!
http://www.geocities.com/pterandon/povcdcontest.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I thought a CD was already available with images and tools and more...
Mike
"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote in message
news:38B6925B.51EDB821@my-dejanews.com...
> Tell me what you think of my povray CD idea!
>
> http://www.geocities.com/pterandon/povcdcontest.html
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
See what I am proposing at that web page.............
Well, the current CD might:
1) have a sparse collection of the extremely very best determined by a
limited number of people, not several hundred ranked by the general
population and collected from a general call to the public;
2) have works <<1999.
Seriously, if a large handful of people think this idea will harm either
news.povray.org or the IRTC, I'll drop the idea. Vote on the web page
moreso/ in addition to complaining here. I've already got a handful
saying they'd help and/or contribute. If you think it's a bad idea, go to
the web page and vote against it. There's a poll at the end!
Mike Weber wrote:
> I thought a CD was already available with images and tools and more...
>
> Mike
>
> "Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote in message
> news:38B6925B.51EDB821@my-dejanews.com...
> > Tell me what you think of my povray CD idea!
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/pterandon/povcdcontest.html
> >
> >
> >
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's a good idea; if people don't like it they can simply not submit
anything. :-)
--
___ ______________________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"Sitting on a cornflake, waiting for the van to come" -Beatles
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A note, you should tell people who submit to use high-qiality
compression; no-one wants a CD full of JPG artifacts... :-)
(and be prepared to wait for upload times, which isn't that bad probably
actually)
--
___ ______________________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"Sitting on a cornflake, waiting for the van to come" -Beatles
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I see a major problem with this, the XOOM agreement states that everything
you post they can use (well basically that's what it's saying). Some
artists might not want other companies to have unrestricted access to their
work.
I'm not sure totally about the agreement but I'm sure there are some
problems with it. Thus, it would probably be better to have some space set
up somewhere else on a private server, but this costs money. Unless of
course someone is willing to set up a server to host this (oh wait a second,
that means then there'd be MORE maintenance than there currently is...)
Any ideas?
--
Lance.
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, maybe someone could set up a temporary server with specific on/off
times and then it would be private and not public. Then that person could
pass the complete thing on to whomever were to make the CDs. BTW, this
person should have at least a cable modem connection to supply enough
bandwidth for everybody.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I guess the final stuff would have to be sent to Mr Cason anyway, I'm not
sure what kind of connection he has.
Considering the files would probably be JPEG and around 250 kb each it
shouldn't be too much of a problem with simultaneous traffic.
I'd would have been willing to do it but I'm sure I've already complained
enough about the lack of cable and high speed access in Australia already.
--
Lance.
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Xoom's TOS page says:
You grant to XOOM.com and its affiliates a
royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable,
nonexclusive,
worldwide, unrestricted license to use,
copy, modify,
transmit, distribute, and publicly perform
or display the
submitted pages or other content for the
purposes of
displaying such information on XOOM.com's
sites and
for the promotion and marketing of
XOOM.com's
services. XOOM.com disclaims ownership of
member
sites and will not resell or otherwise
convey these
rights to any third party.
So yes, if there were a XOOM! magazine like the YAHOO! magazine, a small sample
of the submitted work could end up in a magazine article. Xoom could also
possibly take a sample and briefly display in a TV ad for xoom.com.
I do not think we have to fear xoom selling a CD-ROM of our web page. Correct?
I would choose xoom because
1) it's free-- it's within my ability to do this for the pov team;
2) and the tos is not oppressive.
Lance Birch wrote:
> I see a major problem with this, the XOOM agreement states that everything
> you post they can use (well basically that's what it's saying). Some
> artists might not want other companies to have unrestricted access to their
> work.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |