Xoom's TOS page says:
                                    You grant to XOOM.com and its affiliates a
                                    royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable,
nonexclusive,
                                    worldwide, unrestricted license to use,
copy, modify,
                                    transmit, distribute, and publicly perform
or display the
                                    submitted pages or other content for the
purposes of
                                    displaying such information on XOOM.com's
sites and
                                    for the promotion and marketing of
XOOM.com's
                                    services. XOOM.com disclaims ownership of
member
                                    sites and will not resell or otherwise
convey these
                                    rights to any third party.

So yes, if there were a XOOM! magazine like the YAHOO! magazine, a small sample
of the submitted work could end up in a magazine article.  Xoom could also
possibly take a sample and briefly display in a TV ad for xoom.com.

I do not think we have to fear xoom selling a CD-ROM of our web page. Correct?

I would choose xoom because
1) it's free-- it's within my ability to do this for the pov team;
2) and the tos is not oppressive.



Lance Birch wrote:

> I see a major problem with this, the XOOM agreement states that everything
> you post they can use (well basically that's what it's saying).  Some
> artists might not want other companies to have unrestricted access to their
> work.
>

Post a reply to this message