Peter Popov wrote:

> Every software is buggy. It is merely a matter of time until a bug
> manifests itself and the a matter of self-respect on behalf of the
> program maker(s) to disclose that information to the public.

There are degrees of buginess that I can tolerate. I have heard that
the windows version of GIMP is impressively buggy. I welcome any
information that would dispell that.

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1200+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message

I have been playing with GIMP for Win95.  Frankly, I love it.  So far, I
have experienced fewer GPF's with GIMP than with any piece of MS software.
It has at times terminated itself, but it has never effected any thing else,
and it's not often enough to annoy me.

Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:383B1B2F.E83C2445@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> >
> > Just discovered this in my windows version of gimp... I shall have to
play.
> >
> > Mick
>
> I haven't tried the windows version or any version for that matter. I
> have heard that there are many unresolved problems with the windows
> version of GIMP and have hesitated downloading buggy software. How
> has it performed for you and are you satisfied with its performance ?
>
> --
> Ken Tyler -  1200+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message

"mr.art" wrote:

> Could you post where you got your Windows version of Gimp?
> Thanks
>
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> >
> > Just discovered this in my windows version of gimp... I shall have to play.
> >
> > Mick
> >

http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/


--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.

Post a reply to this message

Ken wrote in message <383B2DA9.F763F2DA@pacbell.net>...
>There are degrees of buginess that I can tolerate. I have heard that
>the windows version of GIMP is impressively buggy. I welcome any
>information that would dispell that.


The only bugs I've found are:
  If you minimize the main GIMP window, you get a message saying "assert
failed".  You can ignore this bug.
  Sometimes you get messages about functions being called reentrantly.  You
can usually ignore this bug, but sometimes it causes the GIMP to crash.
I've only had it occur when working with images bigger than 1200x3600.

Mark

Post a reply to this message

The only problem I've encountered so far is that it won't support my wacom
pen, I have to use a mouse!

Mick
Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:383B1B2F.E83C2445@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> >
> > Just discovered this in my windows version of gimp... I shall have to
play.
> >
> > Mick
>
> I haven't tried the windows version or any version for that matter. I
> have heard that there are many unresolved problems with the windows
> version of GIMP and have hesitated downloading buggy software. How
> has it performed for you and are you satisfied with its performance ?
>
> --
> Ken Tyler -  1200+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message

Ken wrote:

>There are degrees of buginess that I can tolerate. I have heard that
>the windows version of GIMP is impressively buggy. I welcome any
>information that would dispell that.

I have it running under NT with almost no problems, a few filters (gfig) and 
scripts don't work. But the system never crashes, just kill the filter that 
gives the problem.
Tried to install it on my machine (dell/win95) at work. It was unusable, a 
big mess. I don't know why, think it's something with the graphics card.


Ingo

-- 
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray    : http://members.home.nl/seed7/

Post a reply to this message

The last version I tried (forget the number, dated around September I
believe) under Win95b (OSR2) was pathetic about opening image files of
certain types and the ATI graphics card had troubles no doubt too.  Scripts
for filters were bad 10 to 20 % of the time. And though many times it
carried on through without a crash other times I had to Ctrl-Alt-Del out.
This has kept me from trying it again (third time last), as good a program
as it was. Filters are inherently applied slowly btw.

Bob

Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:383B2DA9.F763F2DA@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Peter Popov wrote:
>
> > Every software is buggy. It is merely a matter of time until a bug
> > manifests itself and the a matter of self-respect on behalf of the
> > program maker(s) to disclose that information to the public.
>
> There are degrees of buginess that I can tolerate. I have heard that
> the windows version of GIMP is impressively buggy. I welcome any
> information that would dispell that.
>
> --
> Ken Tyler -  1200+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message

thanks

"Jon A. Cruz" wrote:
> 

> http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/
> 
> --
> "My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
> But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.

Post a reply to this message

From 2 sources I got the impression that with certain programming languages
(C?, or a different formal language), when used properly, programs can be
produced that can be proved to be bug-less.

Sci. Am. of severals months back.
2. Work done by my excellent countryman Edsger Dijkstra, who now works in
the USA (http://www.sis.pitt.edu/~mbsclass/is2000/hall_of_fame/dijkstra.htm
not on this subject, this link). I get the impression that things have
progressed since he gave his evaluation of programming languages.
Sander
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=
http://www.ttl98.dsu.edu/moerkeb/_private/a_rose_is_a_rose_is_a_rose.htm
Peter Popov <pet### [at] usanet> schreef in berichtnieuws
dR47OHvBN+DVBRpEWsyM11WNGrs+@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:54:39 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> Every software is buggy.

Post a reply to this message

Are you sure, and was that recently?

The guy porting it put in support a while back for the standard pen API on
Windows. My Aiptek works fine. You might need to read the readme and give it
an option or something.


Mick Hazelgrove wrote:

> The only problem I've encountered so far is that it won't support my wacom
> pen, I have to use a mouse!
>
> Mick
> Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
> news:383B1B2F.E83C2445@pacbell.net...
> >
> >
> > Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> > >
> > > Just discovered this in my windows version of gimp... I shall have to
> play.
> > >
> > > Mick
> >
> > I haven't tried the windows version or any version for that matter. I
> > have heard that there are many unresolved problems with the windows
> > version of GIMP and have hesitated downloading buggy software. How
> > has it performed for you and are you satisfied with its performance ?
> >
> > --
> > Ken Tyler -  1200+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> > http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.htmlhttp://www.povray.org/links/

--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.

Post a reply to this message