 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lance Birch schrieb:
> here, no need to attack me over this OK?) women seem to have greater
> artistic ability than men (I'm sure a lot of people would agree with me on
Agreed
> that anyway), and seem to be able to express themselves better. The
^^^^^^^^^^
I'd guess that the can express *other* beings (things or humans)
better than men, but just *not themselves* (IMHO a consequence
of the education -- girls are still told to be nice and quiet and
to have no own wishes/needs, (which causes them to neglect their
own emotions (or even, in extreme cases, to be unable to feel
them)), boys the opposite). [The bad consequences of these two
educations are IMHO high criminality by men and lots of
bulimia/depressions etc. by women.]
In order to express something beyond oneself, this something has
to be present, which is why men (who are trivially present to
themselves) like to hack on ASCII consoles (thereby expressing
themselves), whilst women prefer to communicate with people who
are significantly closer to them than 255 TCP/IP hops.
Ralf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> girls are still told to be nice and quiet and
Not around here :-)
Believe me on that one...
(That's a good thing too)
--
Lance.
---
For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
Colorblind - http://listen.to/colorblind
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Precisely, in what quadrant of the past millenium do you live? [thinking
1902] ;)
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansas net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Loads of girls use paint packages and produce artistic looking
web sites but for some reason don't seem to be interested in
raytracing.
A gril where I worked about a year ago was a really good artist,
she used printers, scanners, paintpackages and produced some
stunning work, but when I told her about ray tracing she wasn't
interested.
Ken started a similar thread to this quite some time ago about
the same time as the "Where are you thread?".
GrimDude wrote:
>
> There are tons of women using computers! :) They're all in the chat rooms
> ;)
>
> Well, okay, not all of them... <G>
>
> J/K girlies.
>
> GrimDude
> vos### [at] arkansasnet
--
Cheers
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, I know what you mean. It seems (as a generalisation here), that most
female graphic artists do 2D work more than 3D work. I know of several
female graphic artists and designers that do amazing 2D work, but aren't
really interested in 3D.
I think I heard something about some difference in the way males visualise
3D objects compared to females... but I can't remember what the difference
was or the technical side to it...
+ACo-sigh+ACo- memory alloc error +ADs--)
--
Lance.
---
For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
Colorblind - http://listen.to/colorblind
Steve wrote in message +ADw-37763F2B.1B11F906+AEA-ndirect.co.uk+AD4-...
+AD4-Loads of girls use paint packages and produce artistic looking
+AD4-web sites but for some reason don't seem to be interested in
+AD4-raytracing.
+AD4-
+AD4-A gril where I worked about a year ago was a really good artist,
+AD4-she used printers, scanners, paintpackages and produced some
+AD4-stunning work, but when I told her about ray tracing she wasn't
+AD4-interested.
+AD4-
+AD4-Ken started a similar thread to this quite some time ago about
+AD4-the same time as the +ACI-Where are you thread?+ACI-.
+AD4-
+AD4-GrimDude wrote:
+AD4APg-
+AD4APg- There are tons of women using computers+ACE- :) They're all in the chat
rooms
+AD4APg- +ADs-)
+AD4APg-
+AD4APg- Well, okay, not all of them... +ADw-G+AD4-
+AD4APg-
+AD4APg- J/K girlies.
+AD4APg-
+AD4APg- GrimDude
+AD4APg- vossman+AEA-arkansas.net
+AD4-
+AD4---
+AD4-Cheers
+AD4-Steve
+AD4-
+AD4----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
+AD4AJQ-HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjlen+AEA-ndirect.co.uk
+AD4-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Andrew Cocker
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: POV-Survey Statistics!!!
Date: 27 Jun 1999 12:08:09
Message: <37764c69@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lance Birch <lan### [at] usanet> wrote in message
news:377643ed@news.povray.org...
> I think I heard something about some difference in the way males visualise
> 3D objects compared to females... but I can't remember what the difference
> was or the technical side to it...
It's true! I think my '3D object' is a fine example of such things, but my
girlfriend says I'm mistaken! ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
--
Lance.
---
For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
Colorblind - http://listen.to/colorblind
Andrew Cocker wrote in message <37764c69@news.povray.org>...
>
>Lance Birch <lan### [at] usanet> wrote in message
>news:377643ed@news.povray.org...
>> I think I heard something about some difference in the way males
visualise
>> 3D objects compared to females... but I can't remember what the
difference
>> was or the technical side to it...
>
>
>It's true! I think my '3D object' is a fine example of such things, but my
>girlfriend says I'm mistaken! ;-)
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:11:39 +0100, Steve <sjl### [at] ndirectcouk> wrote:
>Loads of girls use paint packages and produce artistic looking
>web sites but for some reason don't seem to be interested in
>raytracing.
>
>A gril where I worked about a year ago was a really good artist,
>she used printers, scanners, paintpackages and produced some
>stunning work, but when I told her about ray tracing she wasn't
>interested.
I once knew a girl that made really good pictures with the Win 3.11
paintbrush in 16 colors. The first time I saw one of her
sunset-over-the-sea pics I thought it was a really beautiful photo and
asked if she could switch to 256 colors so that the dithering wouldn't
hurt the picture so badly. Imagine my amazement when she told me that
she had actually drawn the thing! My disbelief must have shown on my
face, too, because she showed me some in-progress pic and how she
worked on it with. It's a real pity she couldn't afford better
equipment or else she could have been reading this too :)
Peter Popov
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Now that sounds like a true definition of an artist to me. Ability to make good with
what one has to work with.
Peter Popov wrote:
>
> I once knew a girl that made really good pictures with the Win 3.11
> paintbrush in 16 colors. The first time I saw one of her
> sunset-over-the-sea pics I thought it was a really beautiful photo and
> asked if she could switch to 256 colors so that the dithering wouldn't
> hurt the picture so badly. Imagine my amazement when she told me that
> she had actually drawn the thing!
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I used to love watching "Paint Along With Nancy", she used to
produce some really amazing scenes and didn't use a paint brush,
just palette knives. And she always had a piece of toilet paper
in her hand.
Bob wrote:
>
> Now that sounds like a true definition of an artist to me. Ability to make good with
> what one has to work with.
>
> Peter Popov wrote:
> >
> > I once knew a girl that made really good pictures with the Win 3.11
> > paintbrush in 16 colors. The first time I saw one of her
> > sunset-over-the-sea pics I thought it was a really beautiful photo and
> > asked if she could switch to 256 colors so that the dithering wouldn't
> > hurt the picture so badly. Imagine my amazement when she told me that
> > she had actually drawn the thing!
>
> --
> omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
--
Cheers
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
