 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-12-2014 1:18, jhu wrote:
> Ideally, the clock should display both.
>
>
That will be changed on the /new/ site (very soon I hope...)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"s.day" <s.d### [at] uel acuk> wrote:
> To pre-empt Norbert ;-) the source is in p.b.sf
>
> Sean
LOL!
Many thanks, Sean.
Wonderful (as usual) - and I've to ask pardon for mentioning a certain
"emptiness" in the upper and right parts of the image...
By the way - nice mushroom and use of snow.
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
s.day wrote on 08/12/2014 21.09:
> Hi,
>
> This is the final version of this image, I feel like I could go on adding
> details to this scene for a while longer but I am getting near the memory limit
> on my PC and the tc-rtc deadline is nearly here..
>
> Sean
>
Oh, my! It's a stunning image.
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
> scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
> > Amazing - and all SDL too. Should be in the HoF.
>
> Thanks Scott
I agree. Should be in HOF. Does no one update that anymore? The lastest image is
from the last decade (2009). What's the hold up?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 9-12-2014 15:51, s.day wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >>> Consider it a where's wally kind of challenge ;-)
> >>
> >> I can see three with any certainty. Maybe one other...
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >
> > Glad you found them, I am guessing the large one, one over pond and one in front
> > of the tree? I will post a spoiler image with the locations soon.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> Yes. Big one (1); over pond (2); front of tree, right side over bark
> (3). I believe there is another one (4) in front of the tree but almost
> hidden in the moss but hard to see.
>
> Thomas
Hi Thomas,
pretty good considering how difficult they are to spot, the last one is
incorrect though. However, I re-ran a render without grass/water etc and even
then it was tricky to spot the last 2 so I doubled them in size and you can spot
them on this. Still the one on the far right I cannot see on the picture even
knowing where it is (that would be the real wally then ;-)
Sean
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'seeds.png' (2099 KB)
Preview of image 'seeds.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
>
> LOL!
> Many thanks, Sean.
>
> Wonderful (as usual) - and I've to ask pardon for mentioning a certain
> "emptiness" in the upper and right parts of the image...
>
> By the way - nice mushroom and use of snow.
>
> Norbert
No pardon required, that is certainly something that needs improving when I come
back to this scene in the future.
The mushroom and snow did not make the final cut for this scene but I left them
in the source. The snow really needs SSLT (I would only set it to about 2 on the
settings at the top of the file) with sslt it looks pretty good but that was for
an earlier version, I was planning on making the creature in the tree a sort of
jack frost character and therefore having snow around his home etc. but decided
against it and went for a less seasonal theme. I still might do a snow version
though (maybe something to leave rendering over the christmas holiday if it uses
SSLT!).
I also really wanted to have a different variety of plants around the border of
the pond so that is also on the to do list for later versions.
Thanks
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> s.day wrote on 08/12/2014 21.09:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the final version of this image, I feel like I could go on adding
> > details to this scene for a while longer but I am getting near the memory limit
> > on my PC and the tc-rtc deadline is nearly here..
> >
> > Sean
> >
> Oh, my! It's a stunning image.
> Paolo
Thanks
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
> > scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
> > > Amazing - and all SDL too. Should be in the HoF.
> >
> > Thanks Scott
>
> I agree. Should be in HOF. Does no one update that anymore? The lastest image is
> from the last decade (2009). What's the hold up?
This has been commented on before, it is a shame (not just for me ;-) there are
plenty of images that have been placed on the forum since 2009 that would merit
a place in the HOF. It would be great if it could be resurected.
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-12-2014 12:17, s.day wrote:
> pretty good considering how difficult they are to spot, the last one is
> incorrect though. However, I re-ran a render without grass/water etc and even
> then it was tricky to spot the last 2 so I doubled them in size and you can spot
> them on this. Still the one on the far right I cannot see on the picture even
> knowing where it is (that would be the real wally then ;-)
>
I missed the one to the right indeed, and one over the water in the
middle distance then.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
> This has been commented on before, it is a shame (not just for me ;-) there are
> plenty of images that have been placed on the forum since 2009 that would merit
> a place in the HOF. It would be great if it could be resurected.
>
> Sean
I remember becoming a mail about 10 years before from our Chief Diplomacy
HoF and I had to deliver admission, comments and bigger versions within (felt) 3
days, otherwise... ;-)
All joking aside - of course there should be an update and I have some
suggestions...
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'hof candidates imho.jpg' (1229 KB)
Preview of image 'hof candidates imho.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
