|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi all,
Here's a variant of my recent impossible image "Oh Gear Lord". The basic idea is
the same, but this one has two more features that required a few additional
tricks: magic lightning and an engraved text.
I hope you like it. I am interested in hearing which you prefer. This fancier
image, or the more simple gear?
Cheers,
Erwin
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'twistedmagicring-0_9.png' (462 KB)
Preview of image 'twistedmagicring-0_9.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 31/05/2014 22:51, Eriban wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a variant of my recent impossible image "Oh Gear Lord". The basic idea is
> the same, but this one has two more features that required a few additional
> tricks: magic lightning and an engraved text.
>
> I hope you like it. I am interested in hearing which you prefer. This fancier
> image, or the more simple gear?
>
> Cheers,
> Erwin
>
Without a doubt I prefer this one.
The gear would be improved by giving it more detail (smaller and more
teeth, a worm gear. If that were possible.).
The engraved script makes it very believable to my eye.
I would not mind a larger one for wallpaper.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On 31/05/2014 22:51, Eriban wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here's a variant of my recent impossible image "Oh Gear Lord". The
>> basic idea is
>> the same, but this one has two more features that required a few
>> additional
>> tricks: magic lightning and an engraved text.
>>
>> I hope you like it. I am interested in hearing which you prefer. This
>> fancier
>> image, or the more simple gear?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Erwin
>>
>
> Without a doubt I prefer this one.
> The gear would be improved by giving it more detail (smaller and more
> teeth, a worm gear. If that were possible.).
> The engraved script makes it very believable to my eye.
> I would not mind a larger one for wallpaper.
>
In fact, that ring COULD be made for real. It's similar to a thickned
moebius stripe.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/06/2014 19:18, Alain wrote:
>> On 31/05/2014 22:51, Eriban wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Here's a variant of my recent impossible image "Oh Gear Lord". The
>>> basic idea is
>>> the same, but this one has two more features that required a few
>>> additional
>>> tricks: magic lightning and an engraved text.
>>>
>>> I hope you like it. I am interested in hearing which you prefer. This
>>> fancier
>>> image, or the more simple gear?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Erwin
>>>
>>
>> Without a doubt I prefer this one.
>> The gear would be improved by giving it more detail (smaller and more
>> teeth, a worm gear. If that were possible.).
>> The engraved script makes it very believable to my eye.
>> I would not mind a larger one for wallpaper.
>>
>
> In fact, that ring COULD be made for real. It's similar to a thickned
> moebius stripe.
A job for Bill Pragnell. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> > In fact, that ring COULD be made for real. It's similar to a thickned
> > moebius stripe.
>
> A job for Bill Pragnell. :-)
Hmm. *strokes chin*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> Without a doubt I prefer this one.
> The gear would be improved by giving it more detail (smaller and more
> teeth, a worm gear. If that were possible.).
> The engraved script makes it very believable to my eye.
> I would not mind a larger one for wallpaper.
Hi Stephen,
I also prefer this one because of the extra detail. Nevertheless, I don't
actually plan to change my gear image. For one, currently both images are still
fairly distinct, which I like. Furthermore, it's not easy to improve the teeth
without putting too much focus on the fact that they do "jump" from one side to
another. The distance between the teeth prevents it from becoming too
noticeable.
I might render a larger one for use as a wallpaper. If so, what size would you
require?
Cheers,
Erwin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> In fact, that ring COULD be made for real. It's similar to a thickned
> moebius stripe.
More precisely, a ring like the one shown here, which looks to have four
different sides but actually has only two (or even one), can be made for real.
It would, however, look different from the Mage Ring. The Moebius ring could
easily lie flat on a table, whereas that is not so easy for the Mage Ring.
Forcing this would probably require a big hammer wielded, for example, by Gr'hul
the Ghul.
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> > Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> > > In fact, that ring COULD be made for real. It's similar to a thickned
> > > moebius stripe.
> >
> > A job for Bill Pragnell. :-)
>
> Hmm. *strokes chin*
I would love to see that. It would be interesting to see both the similarities
and differences.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/06/2014 22:00, Eriban wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I also prefer this one because of the extra detail. Nevertheless, I don't
> actually plan to change my gear image. For one, currently both images are still
> fairly distinct, which I like. Furthermore, it's not easy to improve the teeth
> without putting too much focus on the fact that they do "jump" from one side to
> another. The distance between the teeth prevents it from becoming too
> noticeable.
>
Hi Erwin,
You are right in every respect. It was but an idle thought.
But thinking on it. The two images are, to me, high up on either side of
the uncanny valley. To combine them would drop them to the depths.
> I might render a larger one for use as a wallpaper. If so, what size would you
> require?
>
Thank you but I don't know how good it would look on a laptop. Aspect
ratio is 16:9. The composition might be difficult. But that is, as they
say, a challenge. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> But thinking on it. The two images are, to me, high up on either side of
> the uncanny valley. To combine them would drop them to the depths.
That wouldn't be good. So better leave them both as is. ;-)
> Thank you but I don't know how good it would look on a laptop. Aspect
> ratio is 16:9. The composition might be difficult. But that is, as they
> say, a challenge. ;-)
Attached an updated version which you could use as a wallpaper. You may notice
that I took the easy way out with respect to the composition. That, however, was
not just laziness. I actually thinks the large background helps to make the ring
"pop out". Furthermore, this way it will not be immediately covered when you
have a few icons on your desktop.
Cheers,
Erwin
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'magering-1920x1200.jpg' (159 KB)
Preview of image 'magering-1920x1200.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 04.06.2014 22:15, schrieb Eriban:
> Attached an updated version which you could use as a wallpaper. You may notice
> that I took the easy way out with respect to the composition. That, however, was
> not just laziness. I actually thinks the large background helps to make the ring
> "pop out". Furthermore, this way it will not be immediately covered when you
> have a few icons on your desktop.
As an alternative, you could rotate it 90 degrees.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |