 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The first version was beautiful, and so is this one. :-)
--
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmail com -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu
You know you've been raytracing too long when you hire 4 guys named
Vince to help you "borrow" a Cray Supercomputer.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:14:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2008 18:09:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>
>>Gotta love us language pedants. ;-)
>>
>>Jim
>
> I do!
> Readers I married her :)
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Just to be clear, it's not *me* you married. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22 Jan 2008 20:10:01 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:14:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jan 2008 18:09:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Gotta love us language pedants. ;-)
>>>
>>>Jim
>>
>> I do!
>> Readers I married her :)
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
>Just to be clear, it's not *me* you married. ;-)
>
LOL
Unless your name is Regan ;)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Excellent work! I love your dualistic concept. It much appeals to my own
perceptions. Your care for even the least detail is really amazing. This is
going to be a very interesting and beautiful series.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jeremy M. Praay" <jer### [at] questsoftwarecmo> schreef in bericht
news:47963657$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>> o Girl on a swing with the lad pushing her.
>
> I had already started on that concept, but had trouble getting the "on the
> swing" pose to work with the clothes in Poser. Nevertheless, that's one
> idea that I really like, and will hopefully figure out a way to do it.
Maybe PoserPhysics may help here? I have not yet experimented enough with it
to know for sure, but it seems to have possibilities in that direction...
>
> Actually, the child behind the tree is her little sister, but it's kind of
> hard to tell here. I just realized that I forgot to put the ribbon in the
> hat, which should have made it a bit less ambiguous. She looks something
> like this: http://www.stomptokyo.com/img-m2/totoro-1.jpg Initially, there
> was no little sister, but after watching "My Neighbor Totoro" again (a
> couple months ago), that type of character seemed to fit, and she adds a
> bit more to the story.
>
That reminds me of my Cathy series, where I introduced her little brother...
:-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:47:59 +0100, "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet>
wrote:
>
>That reminds me of my Cathy series, where I introduced her little brother...
>:-)
I thought that too.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote in message
news:uhucp3t7d2lj0ricmikd6f98er24str2al@4ax.com...
>
> I remember the original. (Do you have a link?)
http://www.beantoad.com/newimages/bonsaigirlA12a.jpg
This tree was completely replaced. Honestly, it was too small for the pot,
which violates certain principles of bonsai. It may reappear in another
scene, however, as there are some things about that tree that I really
liked.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote in message
news:47970c4c$1@news.povray.org...
> Excellent work! I love your dualistic concept. It much appeals to my own
> perceptions. Your care for even the least detail is really amazing. This
> is going to be a very interesting and beautiful series.
>
Thanks! Bonsai is, of itself, very dualistic. The ideal bonsai would
arguably look like a miniature of a full size tree, so I attempted to
achieve that as well, while still keeping certain other cues, like the
larger-than-normal leaves.
Bonsai purists may hate me for this picture, however, as the introduction of
miniatures into a bonsai is most often frowned upon. Of course, "live"
miniature people might be ok, if the Japanese had some handy. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:33:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2008 20:10:01 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:14:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 Jan 2008 18:09:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Gotta love us language pedants. ;-)
>>>>
>>>>Jim
>>>
>>> I do!
>>> Readers I married her :)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Stephen
>>
>>Just to be clear, it's not *me* you married. ;-)
>>
>>
> LOL
> Unless your name is Regan ;)
Not the last time I checked. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:06:56 -0500, "Jeremy M. Praay"
<jer### [at] questsoftwarecmo> wrote:
>"Stephen" <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote in message
>news:uhucp3t7d2lj0ricmikd6f98er24str2al@4ax.com...
>>
>> I remember the original. (Do you have a link?)
>
>http://www.beantoad.com/newimages/bonsaigirlA12a.jpg
>This tree was completely replaced. Honestly, it was too small for the pot,
>which violates certain principles of bonsai. It may reappear in another
>scene, however, as there are some things about that tree that I really
>liked.
>
Thanks for refreshing (F5) my memory. Why did you change the texture of the
table? I liked the wood that the legs were made from.
The new tree is more pleasing to the eye. Out of curiosity I differenced the two
images in psp. I liked the result.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
