 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I concur, but did you have to use such a example image when my
eyes are already feeling the hours of sleeplessness? X-}
Bob
"Bill DeWitt" <the### [at] earthlink net> wrote in message
news:3918160e$1@news.povray.org...
|
| "Henry" <htp### [at] maccom> wrote :
| >
| > Premise: Rather than a given logo with a set colour scheme, why not an
| > _effect_ which can be bundled in an .inc and rendered into any scene?
| >
|
| That's what I was trying to say all along. -Something- that can be
| subtly introduced to each scene that will tip people off as to what they are
| looking at...
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Would you mind rendering one of these in black and white with some phong on
the black? I'm thinking that would look best with this logo, I'm but not
sure.
--
Dan D.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey I like this one. One thing though, it looks like the C must mean
something
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:39172e10@news.povray.org...
> First, off, thank you, everybody, for your suggestions. I really
appreciated
> them. :)
>
> Here's the latest version of the logo. I tried everybody's ideas, but only
> got around to implementing the following changes:
>
> a) Color-sheme
> b) Slight changes in sizes
> c) Slight change in rotation of the ellipse, to better mimic a real eye.
>
> Once again, thank you everybody for the suggestions leading to the current
> stage of the image.
>
> I'm also providing a black and white version of it, so you can get a
gander
> at that, and I also added the text "POV-Ray" so you can see what it looks
> like with it. It isn't actually part of the logo. It's only there to show
> that the logo doesn't need it, it's simply a redundant complement to those
> who know it, and it tells first-timers to what program it belongs.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 May 2000 16:11:04 -0400, "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet>
wrote:
>First, off, thank you, everybody, for your suggestions. I really appreciated
>them. :)
This is by far the best one that I have seen here! To be quite honest,
I was getting pretty sick of logos, and none of them seemed
appropriate for use - until now. This one is perfect. Can someone
announce a winner please? :)
I have even seen some of your later variations, created for Chris Huff
I believe, and this one is still better by far. I've attached a
slightly different black and white version to this message. I simply
converted your full color file to black and white, without dithering,
and this is what I got. I like it a bit better than your black and
white variation. This one still has highlights visible. Let me know
what you think of it.
Later,
Glen Berry
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'eye128_gb.jpg' (6 KB)
Preview of image 'eye128_gb.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 08 May 2000 17:01:16 -0500, Chris Huff
<chr### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>It still looks like a hydrogen atom to me though,
I think you're the only one saying this. I never thought "hydrogen
atom" when I saw it, even though I *do* understand why you might say
that.
I appears that creating a logo everyone really likes will be only
slightly easier than achieving a sustainable cold fusion reaction.
:)
Later,
Glen Berry
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 May 2000 16:27:59 -0400, "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet>
wrote:
>>The color scheme really helped. Now it's getting there!
>
>Woohoo! Uh... so what's keeping it from "being there"?
As far as I'm concerned, it *is* there.
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I *knew* someone would comment about that!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>This one is perfect. Can someone
>announce a winner please? :)
Aw, c'mon, don't exaggerate. I'm sure that there might be a better one out
there. (Please don't post it, anyone.) ;)
>I have even seen some of your later variations, created for Chris Huff
>I believe, and this one is still better by far.
Like I said, this is one variation, the other is another. It's up to you
guys to decide where this goes.
>I've attached a
>slightly different black and white version to this message.
>I like it a bit better than your black and
>white variation. This one still has highlights visible.
It does look better. I've been extracting my b&w versions from the inverse
of the alpha channel. I'll stop doing that now. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:3918a5be@news.povray.org...
> >This one is perfect. Can someone
> >announce a winner please? :)
>
> Aw, c'mon, don't exaggerate. I'm sure that there might be a better one out
> there. (Please don't post it, anyone.) ;)
I was starting to worry about this too. With all the attention given
this one logo, what will those people who have been working quietly on the
side be thinking. Perhaps the best logo will never be posted because it's
author thinks that a decision has already been made.
I can't see anyway around it since we all want comments on our work and
we all want to comment on work we like. But I think that announcements of
preference should wait until we at least have submission rules.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
