Remco de Korte wrote:

> Never mind sending the images, I already solved the problem. It was a stupid
> mistake (that's me!).
> I added the FPS-selector so now there's a new version again.
> Sorry.
> 
> Remco
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~remcodek/pov.html

  There is no need to apologize for fixing a bug and then adding extra
functionality in the process.

Thank you for your hard work !

-- 
Ken Tyler

See my 700+ Povray and 3D Rendering and Raytracing Links at:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html

Post a reply to this message

In article <37BDDB45.26C2146D@xs4all.nl> , Remco de Korte 
<rem### [at] xs4allnl>  wrote:

> Thanks for the link but I couldn't find anything there that would help me
> implement this in a simple way. I did some searching on the net but I could
only
> find commercial stuff to add PNG-support.

Check out the POV-Ray source. The PNG library is freely available.


     Thorsten


____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany

Post a reply to this message

This sounds great.  I'll d/l it next time I go surfing.

Remco de Korte wrote:
> 
> Remco de Korte wrote:
> >
> > Phil Clute wrote:
> > >
> > > Wow that's a handy little program. Thanks, that'll be going in my
> > > tools menu.
> > >
> > > I tried one of my animation shorts in all formats and it looks like
> > > .tga isn't working. The first frame displays, and it flickers like
> > > it's going through the animation but never displays anything but
> > > the first frame. I usually save in .tga too.
> > >
> > > I have a request if your up for it. Would it be difficult to add
> > > a fps(frames per second)selector? So when I'm working on an animation
> > > I can get a feel for the speed of my moving objects.
> > >
> > > Phil
> > > --
> > > ...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.
> >
> > Uh-oh.
> > I tested it with TGA and it worked. What could be the problem here?
> > Could you perhaps send me some (3 or 4) of your frames to see what's up?
> > The fps-selector is a good suggestion. I'll work on that.
> > I have to pass on the PNG for now, it seems to be too much work, sorry Jon.
> >
> > Remco
> 
> Never mind sending the images, I already solved the problem. It was a stupid
> mistake (that's me!).
> I added the FPS-selector so now there's a new version again.
> Sorry.
> 
> Remco
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~remcodek/pov.html

-- 
Cheers
Steve

email - mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee. 

web:  http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/

Post a reply to this message

Ken wrote:
>There is no need to apologize for fixing a bug and then adding extra
>functionality in the process.

Not to mention the break-neck speed at which you add these new features.

>Thank you for your hard work !

I'll second that!

-- 
...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.

Post a reply to this message

Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> 
> In article <37BDDB45.26C2146D@xs4all.nl> , Remco de Korte
> <rem### [at] xs4allnl>  wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the link but I couldn't find anything there that would help me
> > implement this in a simple way. I did some searching on the net but I could
> only
> > find commercial stuff to add PNG-support.
> 
> Check out the POV-Ray source. The PNG library is freely available.
> 
>      Thorsten
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany

I have several files containing docs and sources now, but as far as I have seen
now it's mostly C++ and I haven't been able to figure out yet how much work it
is to convert that to Delphi. With the other file formats it was just adding a
function call to a DLL. ButI must admit, I have put a couple of hours in
searching the web now, but little time in actually checking out the sources.

Remco

PS
...and please don't start telling now that this is why C++ is soooo much better
then Delphi.

Post a reply to this message

> ...and please don't start telling now that this is why C++ is soooo much better
> then Delphi.

...and that is why C++ is soooo much better than Delphi.

--
Anthony L. Bennett
http://welcome.to/TonyB

Non nova, sed nove.

Post a reply to this message

TonyB wrote:
> 
> > ...and please don't start telling now that this is why C++ is soooo much better
> > then Delphi.
> 
> ...and that is why C++ is soooo much better than Delphi.
> 
> --
> Anthony L. Bennett
> http://welcome.to/TonyB
> 
> Non nova, sed nove.

 I think I know what C++ is but what's with this Delphi stuff ?

-- 
Ken Tyler

See my 700+ Povray and 3D Rendering and Raytracing Links at:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html

Post a reply to this message

Ken wrote:
> 
> TonyB wrote:
> >
> > > ...and please don't start telling now that this is why C++ is soooo much better
> > > then Delphi.
> >
> > ...and that is why C++ is soooo much better than Delphi.
> >
> 
>  I think I know what C++ is but what's with this Delphi stuff ?
> 
   Delphi is Borlands ver of 'Visual Pascal'. They named it Delphi
because the "visual" interface side is so much better, quicker and easer
then any of the other 'Visual' programs that they felt it was so much
better that it was no longer pascal and deserved a better name then
visual. For something that is mostly interface it will blow away just
about any other language. For something that needs lots of background
code it's Pascal, how ever you feel about pascal. It seems to me that
it's harder to program then basic but runs faster, it's easer then C++
but runs a little slower and you don't have quite as much access to the
hardware.

Post a reply to this message

Remco de Korte wrote:

> Remco
>
> PS
> ...and please don't start telling now that this is why C++ is soooo much better
> then Delphi.

No. That's why Java is soooooooooooooooooooo much better than Delphi.

Now, if only Borland will listen to their user feedback and get Delphi going on
Linux...

--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.

Post a reply to this message

Jon A. Cruz wrote:
> 
> Remco de Korte wrote:
> 
> > Remco
> >
> > PS
> > ...and please don't start telling now that this is why C++ is soooo much better
> > then Delphi.
> 
> No. That's why Java is soooooooooooooooooooo much better than Delphi.
> 
> Now, if only Borland will listen to their user feedback and get Delphi going on
Linux...
> 



it'll even be more or less cross-platform/portable.

not expensive but I feel a little silly spending money on one feature of a
program I give away. So, as soon as I can find a reason to use it somewhere else
I'll get back here with yet another update, but until then I fear: no PNG
(unless someone would still come up with a free DLL).

Regards,

Remco

Post a reply to this message