"Droj" <803### [at] drojde> wrote:
> "Tor Olav Kristensen" <tor### [at] TOBEREMOVEDgmailcom> wrote:
>
> Hi TOK,
> >
> > Thank you Droj. It was an interesting challenge to make this.
> >
>
> I suppose it was more than one weekend's work.
>
> > That's indeed a nice L-system tree. I think I like it more than the one PB made.
> >
> Thank you so much. Sometimes coding morons like me have their bright moments.
>
> > Is it this axiom and rule that you had to adapt ?
> >
> >   axiom = FX
> >   X -> >[-FX]+FX
> >   angle = 40
> >
> Yes, this was the one. I had to scratch my head more than once when I used it.
> It couldn't be symmetric and an angle of 40 could not be right.
> I usually trust PB a lot but I guess something went wrong during publishing...
>
> > If so, then I've shown how this can be used without much adaptation in a new
> > example in the repository.
>
> I definitely support the idea. We are still scratching on the surface of what
> L-System is capable of.
>
> But do you think you still have the energy and the time to lift that baby from
> 2D to 3D?
> Think of the 2D Hilbert curve and imagine how it would look in 3D.
> I usually say it looks like the mad plummer struck again. But should we get
> there I would die happily.
> Gilles Tran published something like that but it is more than weird.
> >
> > Please post some more images made with the axioms and rules that you've
> > collected.
> >
> Of course I will but to be adequate to your examples I have to dig deep, bite my
> fingernails and scratch my head a lot more.
>
> Cheers, Droj

Here is the Hilbert curve

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'hilbert_curve.pov.txt' (3 KB)