hi,

ingo <ing### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> in news:web.6084981fcab7490879819d986cde94f1@news.povray.org jr wrote:
> > not an option?
> Oh yes, now they seem to be fixed.

and will allow you to be more .. savage in shortening key/index names, because
you then have a namespace of sorts.  nb last night's "it is late" post example
is wrong, each respective last element would still be '[ name ]'.


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message