POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Future of missing "assume_gamma" : Re: Future of missing "assume_gamma" Server Time
27 Apr 2024 20:36:39 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Future of missing "assume_gamma"  
From: Bald Eagle
Date: 3 Nov 2019 10:05:01
Message: <web.5dbeeb9c7fa1c384eec112d0@news.povray.org>
> > My question is: Why will this become a fatal error, instead of just defaulting
> > to 1.0?  It seems like most people would *want* there to be some sensible
> > default, instead of breaking and having to add additional keywords to their
> > scenes.  I know I would, anyway.

http://wiki.povray.org/content/User:Clipka/Gamma

I doubt that it would be assigned to fatal error status, and instead have a
default, and just issue a warning.
As it is, you can have scenes with no light and no camera, and they still
"render"...

I think that after all of the hair-yanking, brain-hurting effort that's been put
in over the years to get the gamma handling of POV-Ray onto solid footing, that
clipka simply wants people to be cognizant that working with an assumed_gamma of
1.0 is the way to go, and all other scene "fixes" can be addressed by some other
mechanism.

I couldn't find the particular thread where he explains the many pitfalls of
improperly using gamma != 1.0, but I can assure you that he has expostulated
passionately and extensively on the topic.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.