Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> It is not really that difficult. At least it wasn't in Ver 3.5. When I
> last used the function. You write a text file in PovRay with the
> variables you need and get the 3rd party software to export the results
> of the calculations to a text file that PovRay can read.
> Yes this would be an animation even if it is only two frames or a frame
> per layer.
I guess my question was whether or not Voro++ is set up to accept comman-line
parameters and return a file for immediate processing by POV-Ray.
If so, then it would be of great interest to those who have a continuing
interest in having direct access to the set of coordinates used for the crackle
pattern - by supplanting crackle with a Voro++ data file, that would be a great
workaround.
> I ask myself if something this complex is appropriate for a first year
> engineering course. But then my first year at university detailed
> thermionic valves and ne'er a mention of semiconductors. :) So things
> might have changed.
It ought to be perfectly fine.
I remember the engineers on my floor constantly being immersed in Statics:
http://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/Book/RuinaPratap8-21-10.pdf
Post a reply to this message
|
