Mike Horvath <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> On 3/11/2017 5:19 PM, Mike Horvath wrote:
> > On 3/11/2017 2:44 PM, Shay wrote:
> >> Anyone who believes in an objective position on cell harvesting is
> >> following
> >> some type of religion.
> >>
> >
> > I don't think it's a "religion" to say, "Cell harvesting could produce
> > beneficial results."
> >
> >
> > Mike
>
> Or, even that it is "extremely likely" to produce beneficial results.
>
>

It's certainly not entirely scientific.

Can you tell me--using capital-R Reason alone--the difference between
"beneficial" and "good" (as in "good vs. evil)?

Post a reply to this message