clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:

> I also think it quite healthy because it includes both reason /and/
> emotion, and my guess is that this is exactly what most of us like best
> about the atmosphere (do you say that in English?) of this newsgroup.

This newsgroup is typical in that disagreement is "allowed" as long as *certain*
assertions are not challenged.

In the US currently, we can calmly argue over /how/ to deal with Isis, but

nutcase.

Similarly, in p.o-t we can calmly argue over the specifics of king-for-a-day

the king-for-a-day premise itself is quickly, sharply admonished.

Post a reply to this message