Anton Sherwood <bro### [at] poboxcom> wrote:
> On 2001-5-15 22:40, Anton Sherwood wrote:
> > ... Meanwhile, another idea: if (dx,dy,dz) were replaced with
> > (dx+dy,dx+dz,dy+dz), the `crystal' would be a rhombic dodecahedron.
>
> Or not.  Less than 13 years later, as I was thinking about something
> unrelated to ray-tracing, it hit me that it would have to be
>  (dx+dy, dx-dy, dx+dz, dx-dz, dy+dz, dy-dz).
>
> --
> *\\* Anton Sherwood *\\* www.bendwavy.org

You persevere I'll say that for you. :-)

Post a reply to this message